User talk:RenaatPeeters

Welcome![edit]

Hi RenaatPeeters! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Love of Corey (talk) 14:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cayo Confites (April 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't seem to yet meet WP:GEOLAND. One source gives a single mention, with no detail, and the second simply co-ordinates.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cayo Confites and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cayo Confites, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RenaatPeeters! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 20:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They are not copyvio violations[edit]

My editions on Demographics of Russia, i was only adding figures, true figures, in Wikipedia the information is added, what is the problem with that? I have to add it because otherwise the page is outdated, and only one page that does not say almost nothing about its demography, or a historical building.

I am not doing copyright because the information is fair, it does not say more or less than what it has to say, the web pages did not create that data, it is real data that was created by a government institute, or the history of a historic building, and you delete everything from me and accuse me.

It is information so important and they are happening right now and cannot be hidden, that simple.--BrugesFR (talk) 17:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to add the data again, because they are the same data that appear in all the demographic articles of the countries, one of the lowest total fertility rate, mean age of the inhabitants, that the population had 10 million fewer inhabitants in the decade past, the birth rate, are issues that must be placed, there, they should not be deleted.

if you saw, I changed the paragraphs so as not to add it exactly the same.--BrugesFR (talk) 18:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion Casa del Cabildo (Cartagena, Colombia)[edit]

I just fixed it, I summarized it to the maximum, I can't take more from it since it was the history of the building. Since I left only important data of its history, please remove the tag you put, so you don't delete it. --BrugesFR (talk) 15:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete the article if I summarized it and was ok?, I want to makes a complaint to you for this here on Wikipedia, I'm going to do it.--BrugesFR (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the complaint I made about the deletion of Cabildo of Cartagena article on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard--BrugesFR (talk) 17:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will not enter into discussions with users who threaten with legal action in their first response. RenaatPeeters (talk) 19:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Convent of Santo Domingo, Arequipa[edit]

@RenaatPeeters: It's already fixed, I changed words and removed others but I can't remove much text since it's the history of the building. And no, obviously they were not legal actions, how am I going to sue you for a wikipedia page. English is not my first language, I don't know some words yet, that's why I changed what it says after the 5 seconds.--BrugesFR (talk) 19:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from that, if you read the pages of that book, you realize that not even half of the information about the building is described as the book does.--BrugesFR (talk) 20:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed up. now it seems to me that they cannot have copyright complaints, since there are no copypio. So I'm going to remove the deletion tags from the two articles in an hour, by your leave.--BrugesFR (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is how to write well in wikipedia, by means of good references you add information. this is how i did it.--BrugesFR (talk) 20:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have a beautiful day[edit]

Please stop friend, Let's make peace, I really want to edit on Wikipedia, I'm just improving wikipedia by editing now without violating anything, don't bother with me.

See the editing, I'm just making good editing, so please dont delete it. I hope you help me, I never wanted to do something bad on Wikipedia, everything is in good faith, and now I don't make mistakes. I study at a university, and the English Wikipedia will always be an important part of my life, which I like, support and defend.--Cumbia del Rio (talk) 04:56, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]