User talk:Redmind

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to IBES, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: IBES was changed by Redmind (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-03-21T09:14:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hi Redmind! welcome to Wikipedia!

Be bold in editing pages and don't let others scare you off! To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp.

Here are some links that you might find useful:

  Wikipedia:How to edit a page
  Tutorial
  Sandbox, the place where you can experiment
  Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.
  Wikipedia:Five pillars
  Wikipedia:Manual of Style

You can contribute in many ways

  write an article
  fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Improve illustrations and upload new images
  perform maintenance tasks
  Become member of a project that interests you

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. If you need help, you can drop a note on my talk page or use Wikipedia:New contributors' help page. You can also type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia! utcursch | talk 09:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Oliver Dimitrije Mitevski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 13:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oliver Dimitrije Mitevski[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Oliver Dimitrije Mitevski, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unlikely to be able to establish notability at this stage. A detailed rebuttal of supposed sources is on the talk page. There appears no readily identified substantiation of any assertion of notability, which is certainly consistent with one phrase in the article: "his work has never received wider recognition in the art world".

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:22, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]