User talk:Reasoned skeptic

Welcome!

Hello, Reasoned skeptic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

The Deerhunter

If what you added is a quote from a critic, it needs to be clear that this was a question that was asked -- although to be frank, the article is already pushing a lot of boundaries insofar as an encyclopedic entry goes (and at the very least it is way too long). WP is not meant to be a place for reviewing films, and is also not a repository for everything the press has said about it. I'm of the mind that the info you were adding is best left out, but again, if it needs to be in there, it definitely needs to read as a quote by a source of substance with regard to criticism of the film. As it read previously, it sounded like a random open ended question without any clarification as to why it was included. Ryecatcher773 (talk) 07:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks for explaining. I inserted some revised language, and hope that addresses your concern. If not, maybe I'm not quite understanding your point, and you might suggest an alternative? As I interpret it, the controversy is along the lines of whether the conclusion is meant to be for or against patriotic values Reasoned skeptic (talk) 23:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)