User talk:RMMP Consulting

Welcome...

Hello, RMMP Consulting, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Novangelis (talk) 17:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war policy[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aspartame and Aspartame controversy. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
This is based upon edits generated by 174.28.36.243 (talk) in the half hour before your account was createdNovangelis (talk) 17:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your username[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (RMMP Consulting) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this:

It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization.
Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --CliffC (talk) 17:26, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deli nk (talk) 17:30, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; you are welcome to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Courcelles 20:56, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RMMP Consulting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

RMMP Consulting is the agent of author/columnist David Lawrence Dewey, author of the article that we are trying to contribute to the two pages concerning Aspartame to make it more bias instead of the PRO tone for Aspartame that has been posted in Wiki RMMP Consulting (talk) 22:15, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think you quite understand what you've done wrong, here. Please read our guideline on points of view before requesting unblock again. — Joseph Fox 22:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RMMP Consulting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Alright, what about this below, this simply states the article and contents without comment. Can this be posted and if not please explain why?

In September 1996, author and columnist, David Lawrence Dewey,wrote an extensive article, Aspartame - Sweetness or Death. The article contains research from over 100 studies and statements from FDA scientists who objected of the approval of aspartame. Included in the article is the original FDA list of 92 reported side effects from over 10,000 consumers. The article has been continously updated since 1996 with the latest research from researchers all over the world..

Aspartame - Sweetness or Death - 16 August 1996

Decline reason:

Please include a decline reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edit reverted[edit]

This is to remind you that your edit on Talk:Aspartame/Comments has been reverted because it is a copy of an e-mail address. --nymets2000 (t/c/l) 21:43, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And your edit at User talk:CliffC was reverted for the same reason --nymets2000 (t/c/l) 21:44, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]