User talk:RB9610

December 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Copa União, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

I am sorry. I had not an account at Wikipedia and just thought that would not be necessary to have one to correct the information at the page. Now I have re-edit with the correct facts as a decision made by the Brazilian Supreme Court. RB9610 (talk) 15:02, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

RB9610, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RB9610! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020 (part 2)

Hi, I'm Bass77. Some of your recent edits to Copa União have been flagged as a type of vandalism called section/page blanking. Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without prior discussion on the talk page or providing a reasonable citation. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Bass77_talkcontribs 05:30, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

It was not vandalism as the decision of Brazilian Supreme Court about Sport Recife to be the rightful Champion of Copa União 1987 and not Flamengo as it is written um the page. I will correct everything again... RB9610 (talk) 22:16, 27 December 2020 (UTC)