User talk:Puark

Taguieff

You recently added on this article that "Taguieff does not define himself as a "Jewish intellectual". In fact, he actually isn't Jewish at all ; this debate started with an article written by Tariq Ramadan who claimed (falsely) that Taguieff was a Jew. I think this should be mentionned clearly on the article to avoid further confusion on this issue. Would you mind making the "nuance"? Yours, Warheiterister (talk) 19:52, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Revilo P. Oliver

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Revilo P. Oliver, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Fram (talk) 14:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Henryk Pająk

You should probably start by stipulating how many books he wrote, linking (even if it's a redlink) to the newspaper he edited, etc. The skeleton I nominated was that of just another writer (like myself), with no visible assertion of notability (again, like myself). No hostility towards the fine people of Poland was intended. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

MWP

Feel free to edit the article. I am not involved in pro or anti sentiment towards MWP but I think the truth should be stated, not matter what the truth is. I am doing now academic paper on National Democracy so from time to time I add some references here to various articles, as I found vast majority of them unreferenced. Yours. - Darwinek (talk) 22:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

National Revival of Poland

You removed large amounts of sourced information and put your own POV like "Fortunely no-one cares what this institute say" into the article. Therefore, reverted. Thanks, Black Kite 13:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• You (and the IP) have still added unsourced material and various POV stuff that needs to be removed, though. Obviously it's OK to change the article, but you'll need to remove all the unsourced material, ensure that sourced material is left in, and get rid of crap like "abortion - biggest crime of today`s world. In last years abortion have killed more innocent people than holocaust and evan communists crimes." Black Kite 13:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:STALK

Your habbit to stalk around my edits will be reported if repeated again. Same with insertion of Holocaust denial material, removal of sourced info etc. Cheers. M0RD00R (talk) 14:26, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi Puark, I have just stopped by. User Mordoor dislikes your removals of sourced info, yet whenever there is sourced info that he dislikes, he never hesitates to remove it. Fine example of double standards. Tymek (talk) 19:26, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

The less polish sources are used, the better it is. I consider it as an obvious form of xenophobic discrimination. Puark (talk) 06:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Disruption

Please stop this disruption [1]. Deleteng valid sources while claiming in false edit summary opposite can be considered disruptive. Please stop, or you will be reported. M0RD00R (talk) 14:55, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Please note that inserting of links to Holocaust denial webstises also conflicts with WP:RS. If repeated it might be seen as disrpution. Cheers. M0RD00R (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Charles Maurras

Please come back to complete the excellent work you have started on this article. With a few more tweaks, I think it could be a GA. I'm curious about the claim that he was influenced by English empiricists. I realise he was not a legitimist, rather an Orleanist, but this seems quite odd, if it means John Locke (proto-Whig, seems to be the father of much associated with Masonry) rather than Roger Bacon. - Yorkshirian (talk) 14:11, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Puark! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Pierre Milza - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)