User talk:Pilot333

Speedy deletion nomination of Hotjar

Hello Pilot333,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hotjar for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mduvekot (talk) 03:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Pilot333. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Hotjar, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Mduvekot (talk) 03:58, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

@Mduvekot: So you're switching from promotional to WP:COI because it's not promotional? I understand Wikipedia does not like new articles, but I don't get how I even have a relationship with Hotjar? You're not making sense. If it helps, I do not work for HotJar and I do not own Hotjar (even though I wish I did). Pilot333 (talk) 04:37, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

No I'm not switching from promotional to WP:COI because it's not promotional. Quite the contrary. Editors with an undeclared Conflict of Interest typically (not always) write promotional articles, and editors who use promotional language often have a Conflict of Interest, even if they don't recognize it. For example, I have seen employees or interns of companies that they write about claim they have not been paid to write the article. If this doesn't apply to you then there's no reason to take offence. As explained in the guideline you cited, conflict of interest is a description of a situation, not a judgment about that person's opinions or integrity.Mduvekot (talk) 13:28, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Influencer marketing— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:16, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

@GorillaWarfare Hi Molly, can you please be more specific? That took a lot of time, and it still needs more work. The page is written like an essay and has many, many issues. I feel my edit was a strong step in the right direction. - Pilot333 (talk) 02:18, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Larry Wheels

Hello Pilot333,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Larry Wheels for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:11, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Renowned LA (March 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DGG was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not a place for press releases

DGG ( talk ) 06:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Pilot333! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 06:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Albanese Confectionery

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Albanese Confectionery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 06:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Pilot333! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Rejected drafts, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:06, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of E & E McLaughlin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article E & E McLaughlin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E & E McLaughlin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:11, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Renowned LA

Hello, Pilot333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Renowned LA".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Organic CTR manipulation

Hello, Pilot333. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Organic CTR manipulation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Organic CTR manipulation

Hello, Pilot333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Organic CTR manipulation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)