User talk:Pestick

Pestick, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Pestick! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:10, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

China national football team[edit]

Page: China national football team

Are you the same as User_talk:14.231.64.162?

Your deletions have been challenged by another editor, Kai Lau. Per WP:BRD, that means rather than delete the material again, you need to discuss on the talk page and seek consensus. Please don't simply delete the material again. In this edit, you wrote:

here is a discuss in the talk page, made by another editor. You are up against two editors including me. I'm trying to condense the article per TP:Overly detailed. Please don't disrupt the article's renovation process. This is not mainly about dead links, it's about condensing the article and getting rid of excessive intricate details.

This is not two against one. When I wrote on the talk page of the article and on the talk page of User_talk:14.231.64.162, to encourage you to keep editing, I was saying you appeared to be doing good work. I wasn't saying your edits can stick no matter what or that they can't be challenged by another editor. I'm sorry if you got that mistaken impression.

If editors disagree, you have to work with them to try and find a consensus. Please read and follow WP:BRD. If you can't agree you can seek a third party.

I have restored the deleted material for now. Please discuss on talk page of the article the particular revisions (and deletions) and why you think they are warranted. Then let's see what other editors have to say, including Kai Lau. I might join in too. --David Tornheim (talk) 18:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pestick or User talk:14.231.64.162

Please discuss on this Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sports#China_national_football_team talk page of the article the particular revisions (and deletions) and why you think they are warranted. Kai Lau (talk) 16:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To both of you (Kai Lau and Pestick): Please read:

The proper place to discuss a content dispute is on the talk page of the article: Talk:China_national_football_team.

--David Tornheim (talk) 22:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you should do that. Then, even if the editor with whom you wish to discuss matters does not respond, others with an interest may respond and discuss the article with a view to a resolution. Britmax (talk) 15:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have just reverted the page citing that you cannot talk to the user who added this. That is not a suitable rationale for removing cited information. I suggest you self revert this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments made on the China national football team: Revision history page 15:23, 3 May 2020‎ China national football team: Revision history that "Kai Lau has not responded to me for more than a week. How can I discuss with an inactive user?" are false and as shown here on 16:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC) I have been attempting to contact you so we can have a discussion on your edits on a talk page, which David Tornheim emphasised should be held here: Talk:China_national_football_team. Sincerely Kai Lau (talk) 00:13, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-war Warning[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on China national football team; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --David Tornheim (talk) 01:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Mr.User200. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2019–20 Western Libya offensive seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Mr.User200 (talk) 18:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]