User talk:Periksson28
|
I discussed your recent edits of Computational creativity under Talk:Computational_creativity. You might want to respond there. Tivity (talk) 19:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:47, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Creativity Machine Generated Face from 1997.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Creativity Machine Generated Face from 1997.png, which you've sourced to Stephen Thaler. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LightGreenApple talk to me 23:26, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Lectonar (talk) 17:24, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Computational creativity, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --Ronz (Ronz) 15:52, 18 May 2013
Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
This contribution is solid and verifiable. It is being bullied by a computational creativity conference that feels it owns this wikipedia article. If this section is moved to another wikipedia article, as this special interest group desires, it will likewise be bullied in its new location through repeated maintenance templates by the very same folks.Periksson28 (talk) 16:51, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Please put aside the battleground mentality and work with other editors. If the content is as problematic as you think, make a case on the article talk page. Follow WP:DR. I'm happy to assist in getting this worked out. --Ronz (talk) 02:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- [1] is WP:REFSPAM. I suggest starting a WP:STUB article on Thaler instead - don't worry about how much content you add, just try to make it clear that he meets WP:BIO. --Ronz (talk) 02:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Ronz (talk) 16:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- But Thaler would not be judged "notable," as other editors have made clear.Periksson28 (talk) 17:13, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Then do we have any sources that are both independent and reliable that demonstrate his work is important? Otherwise all mention of it and him is at risk of deletion. --Ronz (talk) 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Thaler has been published by a number of peer-reviewed journals produced by Elsevier, Springer, and others. He was invited in 2011 by Springer to produce a review article on his computational creativity patents. His work in this field has been reported in Scientific American, New Scientist, IEEE Spectrum, and Pullitzer's flagship newspaper, the St. Louis Post Dispatch. Furthermore, he has earned two dozen patents in the area this article is all about. To make such a deletion would definitely reveal the deleters' agenda and prejudice.Periksson28 (talk) 17:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Periksson28. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
DABUS[edit]
Hi, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. I've expanded on my reasons for deleting the introductory paragraph you added to DABUS at Talk:DABUS#May_2023_contributions_by_Periksson28. I have left your reversion in place for now, but you may want to respond on the talk page. splintax (talk) 01:46, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, Splintax, I have. Cheers, Periksson28 (talk) 21:18, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)