User talk:Paulleake

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for the work on Durham stuff.

I was wondering what Framwellgate was a few days ago - I found various references on the internet about it but not really explaining where it was. Do you know/could you find this out?

Morwen - Talk 23:22, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chepping Wycombe[edit]

Have you seen my responses on Morwen's talk page? -- Francs 2000 02:01, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Meadowcroft[edit]

Thanks for catching my errors. It is embarassing how sloppy one can get. Ground Zero | t 17:13, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thanks[edit]

Thanks for your answer at Talk:Green_Party_of_England_and_Wales#MP_briefly. – Kaihsu 22:51, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the kind words RE: Clark[edit]

Tried to keep it balanced in areas of persistently conflicting POV writing that needed excising or editing.

Cheers :)

Adrian Lamo 01:15, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For you...don't know if you looked yet![edit]

http://www.genuki.org.uk:8080/big/eng/YKS/NRY/Leake/index.html 68.110.9.62 12:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh Bayley[edit]

Hi thanks for the message. Like you I have seen Hugh Bayley's birth as listed as Oxford in various publications but in Blakes it quotes the birth place as being Maidenhead [1] Its just a case of take your pick, there are no real clues in his biography as to confuse matters he was educated in Hertford.Rob Streatham 11:49, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Socialism[edit]

Paul, you're going to hate me tfor saying this....

You're a good socialist and you know it. KingStrato 10:21, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richmond Town Council[edit]

How come Richmond Town Council uses the arms of Balliol, with a sash of Brittany and topped with the White Rose of York? No Balliol has ever held Richmond, nor was Richmond anything but Tudor if not Lancastrian--being held first of all John of Gaunt's titles and the title held by Henry VII at Bosworth. IP Address 10:28, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smiles[edit]

~Linuxerist E/L/T has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}} or {{subst:smile2}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!

Bad link[edit]

The site which your UserPage says is your blog apprears to be owned by "pinkstuff" now === Vernon White (talk) 00:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Is a temporary problem I think... Paulleake 18:11, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Overseas mission[edit]

Muahahahaha -- Strib 07:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Foote Wood for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Foote Wood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Foote Wood until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Robofish (talk) 16:25, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Foote Wood for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Foote Wood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Foote Wood (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tacyarg (talk) 15:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]