User talk:Parsi123

Your contributed article, God in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, God in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – God in Mormonism. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at God in Mormonism – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. NottNott talk|contrib 12:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

On changing the name of an article

Hey there. You recently tried to move the page God in Mormonism to God in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints - it's understandable why you would want to do this. I however feel like I object to this name change though, so you might want to open up a discussion on Talk:God in Mormonism first to communicate to other editors about your proposed name change. If enough people agree the article's name can be changed - but without this agreement it's too controversial to just move it. If you have any questions please let me know on my talk page, thank you NottNott talk|contrib 12:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I agree. I opened a new line for discussing on it with other users. Thank you for this suggestion. Greetings--Parsi123 (talk) 15:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop

Please stop removing IAST templates and changing Sanskrit text in Devanagari to something else. —SpacemanSpiff 14:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

No incorrect changes, please dont be childish but give references, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with references i will not continue this undo game i have better things to do--Parsi123 (talk) 14:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Addition: á and í etc. are no IAST templates.--Parsi123 (talk) 11:48, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. VictoriaGrayson^Talk 18:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes, it is a violation what you and/or the editor did. I gave clear references, but the vandalism came from the editor, who has likely no enaugh knowledge in this subject and was likely hurt in his honor, if someone changes his/her incorrect editing. It is sad that such a person contact's his/her "Wikipedia friends" to make unfounded intrigue. Are you at least expert in this issue? I am open for positive and FOUNDED critic, but not for this.--Parsi123 (talk) 12:11, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gayatri Mantra. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

If you continue to edit war over the material on Gayatri Mantra, I will block you from editing. This is your final warning. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 18:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes, it is a violation what you and/or the editor did. I gave clear references, but the vandalism came from the editor, who has likely no enaugh knowledge in this subject and was likely hurt in his honor, if someone changes his/her incorrect editing. It is sad that such a person contact's his/her "Wikipedia friends" to make unfounded intrigue. Are you at least expert in this issue? I am open for positive and FOUNDED critic, but not for this. It's a shame and you should be blocked for this, because it's clearly a violation of the rules!--Parsi123 (talk) 12:11, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Parsi123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Parsi123. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)