User talk:PK650/Archives/2022/March
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Greg Fleming live page
Hi @PK650. Thank you for reviewing my article submission. I see the article still has a paid contributions... may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view tag The article has been cleaned up by multiple uninvolved editors, and is a fraction of its original size. Do you feel the warning tag still applies? TerryBG (talk) 13:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- I've removed the tag, given that the issues specified in the talk page seem to have been addressed. If the tagging editor disagrees, I'm sure they'll clearly state why they do so. These are cleanup tags that should not be used as punishment, especially considering Wikipedia's TOS have clearly been observed. I believe the original concerns were pointed at the article's promotional tone and citation overkill. I no longer see evidence for either. PK650 (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Roy David Williams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not appear to meet WP:PROF. Note that there is another "RD Williams" who turns up on Google Scholar searches that is not the same person.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PianoDan (talk) 07:34, 8 March 2022 (UTC)