User talk:OwainAFC

June 2022[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Devonte Redmond, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 07:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the English system, contracts end on 30 June (so players leave clubs on that date) and begin on 1 July (so players join new clubs on that date). Please wait until those dates before editing. Giant Snowman 07:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gareth Bale, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Indian Premier League (June 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references.

Do not resubmit this draft without references. You can ask for advice about references at the Teahouse.

This may be too soon.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 Indian Premier League and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2023 Indian Premier League, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OwainAFC! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited San Marino national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CEST. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arthur Okonkwo[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arthur Okonkwo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Okonkwo (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ––FormalDude talk 14:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 Wrexham A.F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macron.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:11, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me. OwainAFC (talk) 13:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022–23 The New Saints F.C season moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, 2022–23 The New Saints F.C season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --Bears (talk) 16:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to delete please, I thought and didn't do. OwainAFC (talk) 17:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Raheem Sterling, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:34, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like to state that it is simply not unsourced nor poorly sourced, as a reliable and official source has been provided.

Yours sincerely, OwainAFC (talk) 21:36, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:2022–23 The New Saints F.C season[edit]

A tag has been placed on Draft:2022–23 The New Saints F.C season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This page currently exists in article name space.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not do this, I am currently updating it as we speak, there will be references and etcetera. OwainAFC (talk) 19:39, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 Wrexham A.F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Mullin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2022 PDC World Cup of Darts[edit]

Hello, OwainAFC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 PDC World Cup of Darts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox stats[edit]

Please note that we only include domestic league games in the infobox - so no Cup or Continental matches etc. Please also ensure that when you update the stats you also update the date, using ~~~~~. If you have any questions please ask. Giant Snowman 18:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Star Mississippi. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User_talk:Liz that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. this is inappropriate and you know it. Star Mississippi 00:27, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

She just hates Welsh people OwainAFC (talk) 00:28, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're going to be looking at a block if you don't stop doubling down. Star Mississippi 00:52, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't look back in anger OwainAFC (talk) 00:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2022 PDC World Cup of Darts[edit]

Hello, OwainAFC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2022 PDC World Cup of Darts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:42, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 23:52, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What OwainAFC (talk) 10:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was no vandalism .. OwainAFC (talk) 10:33, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OwainAFC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't vandalised anything... OwainAFC (talk) 10:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. I will extend the block indefinitely and block your sockpuppet accounts. Yamla (talk) 12:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock | reason=There is no legitimate example of this happening.OwainAFC (talk) 12:54, 1 October 2022 (UTC)}}[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

-- Yamla (talk) 12:23, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OwainAFC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There's no proof. OwainAFC (talk) 13:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sure there is. Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OwainAFC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Show me what I broke then.OwainAFC (talk) 15:47, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To be unblocked you would need an explanation as to why you created so many accounts. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 16:30, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OwainAFC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

well for one, the accounts that edited the Arsenal pages or the Espanyol one were created when I forgot my password to this account and the rugby one is inactive cos that's my old account and finally, the two inactive were just created cos I was boredOwainAFC (talk) 17:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Block evasion as recent as 3 days ago. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

An response would be nice OwainAFC (talk) 19:17, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've already had three unblock requests reviewed. You'll have to wait, perhaps for quite some time, for your fourth request. It doesn't help that you clearly tried to mislead us about your other accounts, making it almost impossible to trust your word now. I certainly don't think your request is sincere or convincing. --Yamla (talk) 20:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed block evasion as WXMBase earlier today. --Yamla (talk) 21:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah well as they say, Wikipedia staff never like people actually improving the site OwainAFC (talk) 21:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Whether or not you're trying to improve Wikipedia, it is still considered a violation of your original block. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't get right, had I not appealed my original 3-day block, nothing would've happened further. This seems like a punishment for being able to appeal. OwainAFC (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete my accounts at this point please OwainAFC (talk) 17:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not possible, see WP:DELACC. However, you are welcome to simply stop using your accounts and cease editing Wikipedia entirely, if that is your wish. If so, please remove your open unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 18:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will this account ever get unbanned or my IP unbanned OwainAFC (talk) 16:09, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2022 Emirates Cup for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 Emirates Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Emirates Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alyo (chat·edits) 04:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not recommend due to the importance of this page. OwainAFC (talk) 16:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Luis López (footballer, born 2001) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luis López (footballer, born 2001) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis López (footballer, born 2001) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

House Blaster^talk 15:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2022–23 The New Saints F.C season[edit]

The article 2022–23 The New Saints F.C season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Mendy moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Jacob Mendy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2023 Indian Premier League[edit]

Hello, OwainAFC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 Indian Premier League, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2023 Indian Premier League[edit]

Hello, OwainAFC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2023 Indian Premier League".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:36, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jacob Mendy[edit]

Hello, OwainAFC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jacob Mendy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]