User talk:OligoclonalBand

This is OligoclonalBand's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betty Q. Banker has been accepted[edit]

Betty Q. Banker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Liance (talk) 19:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Anne Guggenheim has been accepted[edit]

Mary Anne Guggenheim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diana M. Cejas (December 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

interviews do not contribute to any notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diana M. Cejas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:22, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OligoclonalBand! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:22, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diana M. Cejas (December 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diana M. Cejas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Merry Christmas, and a happy new year)} 21:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Dr. Cejas's story was covered in CBS News, Teen Vogue and Huffpost, all cited here. In June I created a page for Z Paige L'Erario, a transgender neurologist and writer, with significantly less external coverage by secondary sources and less formal leadership in international societies. I am perplexed as to why the one qualifies and not the other. OligoclonalBand (talk) 23:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yasmin Khakoo has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yasmin Khakoo. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 02:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are there new standards? I'm looking at the Wikipedia pages of other neurologists and I don't see additional external verification - often there is little beyond their institutional page.

Khakoo has additional info at a national society, is mentioned in a published textbook on the history of child neurology, and is editor in chief of a major journal (which is verifiable on the journal's masthead).

If there are new standards, I apologize. 174.174.54.144 (talk) 07:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yasmin Khakoo has been accepted[edit]

Yasmin Khakoo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 12:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Renée Shellhaas has been accepted[edit]

Renée Shellhaas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Innisfree987 (talk) 05:21, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratibha Singhi (December 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratibha Singhi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 10:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Much of the info came from this seminal textbook on the history of child neurology, which has a three-page spread on Singhi, because she is the president of the ICNA: https://www.amazon.com/Child-Neurology-Origins-Founders-Evolution/dp/0128216352

Other info came from the International Child Neurology Association, which is an international association of child neurologists. It seems to me that being president of this organization alone would warrant having a Wikipedia page. I added that she was featured in a game because I thought it demonstrated that she is notable, but am happy to remove all reference to it. OligoclonalBand (talk) 16:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratibha Singhi (December 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mach61 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not the place to post your resume. Also, note that citing papers directly to show what fields the subject is active in is original research

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratibha Singhi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 (talk) 20:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this isn't me (I've never met Singhi) and while I am happy to take out the list of papers I think it's interesting that it has never been critiqued on articles I've written about male neurologists. Pratibha Singhi is the president of an international organization. She's featured in a textbook (which I had nothing to do with, I found her there) because she literally started pediatric neurology in India - you can click on the link and see the first page of the essay for free. I get that it's harder for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a woman to have her accomplishments valued but this is pretty ridiculous. I can put it on Twitter and crowd-source it, if you'd like. If others don't think she's notable I'll drop it. OligoclonalBand (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I’m sorry you’re running into difficulties with this. I enjoyed reading another one of your contributions on neurologists and would be happy to help make the notability case clearer. Meet you over there? Innisfree987 (talk) 05:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you! How do I meet you? :) OligoclonalBand (talk) 06:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let’s chat on the draft’s talk page—I’ll ping you! Innisfree987 (talk) 01:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brenda Banwell has been accepted[edit]

Brenda Banwell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:35, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratibha Singhi has been accepted[edit]

Pratibha Singhi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Innisfree987 (talk) 01:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Women in Red[edit]

Hello OligoclonalBand! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to women. I would like to invite you to WikiProject Women in Red, a WikiProject focused on creating entries for women's biographies and related topics and assisting contributors who run into difficulties. If you wish to participate, you can sign up under "New registrations", or feel free to ask for assistance on our talk page any time. Thanks again for your contributions! Innisfree987 (talk) 01:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you again for the excellent bios you’ve contributed on women in neurology. I wanted to let you know that if you encounter any difficulties in the future, there is a WikiProject (a voluntary collective of editors with a shared interest in the subject matter) eager to help out. Happy to have you join us if it might be of interest or use to you. Happy editing! Innisfree987 (talk) 01:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, OligoclonalBand, and welcome to Women in Red. I see that over the past year you have created eight detailed biographies of neurologists, most of them women. We hope to see more in 2024. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I am so happy to see this group. :) OligoclonalBand (talk) 16:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like me to include the WIR template on your user page or would you prefer to leave it blank?--Ipigott (talk) 10:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please do! Thanks. OligoclonalBand (talk) 01:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2024[edit]

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296

Online events:

New: Education (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run M & N | Temperance women

Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2023

Announcement

In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Check out the new navigation on our Women in Red Project home page.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 08:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red February 2024[edit]

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298

Online events:

New: Alphabet run O & P | Black women

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcement

Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red March 2024[edit]

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301

Online events:

New: Alphabet run Q & R | Art+Feminism | Find Her

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements

Celebrate Women – All content gender gap events, in every language Wikipedia, in March 2024
Francophone Women★ Writers Fortnight 2024
Feminism and Folklore 2024 Writing Contest

Tip of the month:

When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red April 2024[edit]

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304

Online events:

New: Alphabet run S & T | Gender studies | Health

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements

The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

If you run into technical problems, you might find help on our Tools and technical support page

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red May 2024[edit]

Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307

Online events:

New: Press women | Alphabet run U, V & W | Central and Eastern Europe

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Wikimedia CEE Spring 2024 - contest with certificates of participation and prizes
The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th

Tip of the month:

Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red June 2024[edit]

Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310

Online events:

New: LGBTQ+ women | Wiki Loves Pride | Women in Music | Alphabet run X, Y & Z

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon June 2024 - Going Back in Time
The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th

Tip of the month:

Find a Grave is NOT a reliable source (as it is user-generated content). It can be used
to look for biographical clues.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]