User talk:NuclearDesignEngineer

December 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm 64andtim. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Enterprise asset management—has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thank you. – 64andtim ^(talk) 04:32, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Enterprise asset management. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 12:06, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was intended to be a general statement for EAM solutions, NOT isolated to a singular application. Please reread the change with this in mind, I am not promoting any SPECIFIC product. Please reconsider the change. If necessary, I can identify a conflict of interest on my Userpage, however that makes no sense as i use EAM on a regular basis, I have first hand experience with several different products, again my addition in solutions applications is not promoting a product but knowledge that EAM solutions applications exist and are not discussed on Wikipedia, if necessary I can generate a new article? NuclearDesignEngineer (talk) 13:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CMISDP (December 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It appears that many of the references you cited are self-published sources, such as pages on the subject's website, press releases, the subject's associated social media pages, etc. These references do not establish notability of the subject - please replace them with a reliable source if possible.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CMISDP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 03:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NuclearDesignEngineer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liance^talk 03:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Standard Design Process (SDP) (December 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Standard Design Process (SDP) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 07:45, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you get back to me as what exactly the issue is so I can make an attempt to correct it? Thank you. NuclearDesignEngineer (talk) 20:31, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Standard Design Process (SDP) (December 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nagol0929 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Standard Design Process (SDP) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nagol0929 (talk) 13:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles[edit]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Design change. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Euclidean geometry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Circuit and Moment. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Nuclear safety and security

added a link pointing to Illumination

Torus

added a link pointing to Deformation

Traffic barrier

added a link pointing to Security Strategy

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes have been corrected. Thank you. NuclearDesignEngineer (talk) 17:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Computer security[edit]

Hello. Regarding your edits to Computer security, please summarize based on independent and secondary sources whenever possible. Please avoid adding redundant links and links to basic terms, per WP:OVERLINK, and please do not add external links to the body of the article, per WP:EL. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]