User talk:Noorullah21/2023

Mughal Khel

Dear Sir/Madam,

I respectfully request your assistance in reviewing my draft article, Draft:Mughal Khel. As a sub-tribe of the Yousafzai, the Mughal Khels are unique in that they are the only Yousafzai tribe residing in Southern Pakhtunkhwa, where they speak a soft version of Pashto. They are based in Bannu and their history and cultural practices have been documented in various online sources and books.

It is my hope that by writing this article, I can contribute to the knowledge base about the Yousafzai tribe and highlight their rich tradition of migration and cultural diversity. I would greatly appreciate your guidance and support in ensuring that the information is accurate and suitable for submission on Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely, 18:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Isparki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isparki (talk • contribs) Noorullah21 (talk) 02:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

@isparki Hello! Thank you for reaching out to me, I see that you require assistance in reviewing your draft article!

I would like to help, but I am not really experienced in "reviewing draft articles". Sorry about that and for the rather late response. I hope you can find some better help from others! It is very thoughtful that you work on this project and I hope your progress continues well! Noorullah21 (talk) 02:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Mohammed>Mohammad

Greetings. Similar move requests have been made for Mohammed Daoud Khan and Mohammed Nadir Shah you might be interested in. WR 00:48, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dost Mohammad Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bala Hissar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry for my edit on the "Khanate of Kokand" page, I didn't notice that the map was fixed. Foggy kub (talk) 07:52, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

It's no problem, I actually noticed I had an old revision of the map I made which I now updated on the page. Noorullah21 (talk) 07:52, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Afghan Civil War (1793-1863) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Afghan Civil War (1793-1863). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and the article does not identify the context for people who are unfamiliar with the subject. Please add sufficient content/context and submit the draft for review. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 09:22, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, I will probably get around to finishing the page when I finish Dost Mohammad Khan specifically. Noorullah21 (talk) 18:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

thanks for the hard work you have done on various wikipedia articles appreciate it! Tarunveer Singh Aujla (talk) 05:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

@Tarunveer Singh Aujla Hey, thanks! Noorullah21 (talk) 06:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Your edit to Dost Mohammad Khan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

@Diannaa Hey, I see and am sorry about this mistake I have made. Do you mind me asking what content specifically was in violation of said copyright so I could properly continue a re-write of it? I'm not sure what part you specifically removed on the Dost Mohammad Khan page as it won't let me see the past revision for reference of what you removed. Noorullah (talk) 18:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dost Mohammad Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghazi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Kasur (1763)

Hey there! You recently edited my article Battle of Kasur (1763). You deleted everything in my article, stating that it is not made with reliable sources. I used Hari Ram Gupta's book History of the Sikhs which is used in almost every Sikh battle. I also got most of my information from panth prakash, the main book of Sikh History. It's a really big reliable source and my work shouldn't have being deleted. (no hate) Ronnie Macroni (talk) 23:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

@Ronnie Macroni The sources you used were not focused on Hari Ram Gupta, and in panth prakash's book, he made claim that over 1 million Afghans were present at the battle, which is clearly showing that it is an unreliable source. I have revamped the page focused with sources on Hari Ram Gupta's book. Noorullah (talk) 00:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

https://archive.org/details/SriGurPanthPrakashVolume2episodes82To169/page/553/mode/2up read the 5th paragraph Ronnie Macroni (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Panth Prakash was written by a Nihang sikh warrior which makes it reliable Ronnie Macroni (talk) 00:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

That doesn't make it reliable, yet again, the Afghans themselves couldn't raise beyond 200,000. Let alone a million. According to Christine Noelle in her books, the Durranis only had a population of 14 million, and Afghanistan itself was 4 million alone both as of 1800.

These statistics provided from Panth Prakash are unreliable. Panth Prakash also affirms that "twelve lakh" which is 1.2 million is present at the battle on page 557. Noorullah (talk) 00:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Honestly it's fine your article looks way better anyways Ronnie Macroni (talk) 00:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for making the article though :) Ronnie Macroni (talk) 00:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Qarawal

Hey Noorullah! this is going to be about the battle of qarawal which is a page you recently created.Another wikipedia user has already created a page discussing this battle already Battle of lahore 1764.I also don't think the location of the battle was qarawal but the battle instead was fought near lahore.A user by the name of @Javerine created that page so you should discuss this matter with him Twarikh e Khalsa (talk) 20:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Exiled

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Exiled, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Battle of Qarawal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Qarawal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Qarawal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Javerine (talk) 01:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

A helpful tool for me and otherwise other editors: Help:Cheatsheet

Rupees and weights

Thought you might be interested in this [1] paper from 1980 that goes into interesting details about Afghan units. I used this to greatly expand and improve Afghan units of measurement. I did a small improvement on Afghan rupee as well which also has potential to be improved further. I think there is a lot more to uncover from rather obscure such sources like these. WR 16:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

@Weaveravel That is pretty interesting, thanks. And nice job on the expansion you did. [2] Noorullah (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

Your edit to Dost Mohammad Khan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. You might also want to see the ongoing discussion at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations, and the the Wikipedia guideline on close paraphrasing. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

It looks like you were warned about this by Dianaaa last month, but went on to add more content that was taken from outside sources. I cannot overstate the importance of summarizing content in your own words rather than copying other peoples' work. This is a serious issue. If you do this again, I will block you. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Battle of the Ravi Ford moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of the Ravi Ford, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:40, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Dost Mohammad Khan

Hey Noorullah,I checked the dost mohammad khan page and noticed that most of the contributions you made got reverted due to plagarism/copyright.I created a sandbox that contains most of the contributions that you made.You can use this sandbox to improve on the information and to maybe rework on the page to make it copyright and plagiarism free.Please note that i got all of this from the wayback machine,so it dosen't contain everythingA few things i recommend is to remove or shorten certain sections as the article itself is quite long, or to create seperate wikipedia pages for some of the topics discussed.Also try your best to write in your own words.Good luck!

User:Twarikh e Khalsa/sandbox Twarikh e Khalsa (talk) 22:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently been editing India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. If you have questions, please request help at the Teahouse.  // Timothy :: talk  13:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

CCI Notice

Hello, Noorullah21. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

sayid dynasty

Hi. I have scene your editing history ,i think you can help. Can you check sayyid dynasty delhi sultanats talk page please. I have given them 6 sources both primary/secondary and old/new but they keep rejecting me for putting Afghan as a thoery in the origins. if you go through the talk page i have explained everything. I think they are - clearly- biased. 92.220.51.19 (talk) 20:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Noorullah21, see Talk:Sayyid_dynasty#"RfC_on_Afghan_inclusion". Per the RFC, it was decided that Afghan ethnicity was not supported by modern secondary sources. Said IP now has decided to ignore the RFC as seen here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:28, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Sayyid dynasty

Hi, i left you a comment on sayid dynasty dispute, whats your thought on that? 178.232.61.65 (talk) 19:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I cannot help you, @Kansas Bear has shown me that a clear consensus was made at Talk:Sayyid_dynasty#"RfC_on_Afghan_inclusion", and thus the idea of an Afghan origin is not supported by Modern Scholars, as is with the Ghurid Empire for example. If you wish to try and change the origins, you need to hold a consensus like the one linked. Noorullah (talk) 04:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

In rfc they pinner a few users that they knew, and i presented modern secondary sources not one but 3. 178.232.61.65 (talk) 10:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User:Twarikh e Khalsa/sandbox. You have been warned before about copyright violations, and now you try to do the same thing again? I will be notifying an admin immediately. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:49, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Jamrud

Hey there i noticed that you removed all of the casualties from the battle of jamrud wiki page.I agree that when it comes to casualties it varies depending on the sources.However i feel like the casualties suffered by both sides should still be mentioned somewhere in the article.Or even stat

WP:3RR

You may be blocked without further notice if you make any further revers on the article Wagner Group mutiny as you have made over 3 reverts in the past 24 hours. Ecrusized (talk) 09:40, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

@Ecrusized Again, read above. It has also not been over 3 reverts. Noorullah (talk) 09:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Diffs: [3], [4], [5] Ecrusized (talk) 09:46, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

@Ecrusized Two of those are reverts, not making it over three. And yet again, read the above. " I was posting what was a more accurate map compared to the other one, you said SVG files were preferred over PNG files, so I replaced it." Noorullah (talk) 09:47, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

3RR means you can't make three, it doesn't mean over three. I suggest you read the page before getting a block. Ecrusized (talk) 09:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

You also said "Russians claim to be in control of regions", but did not specify further beyond that. While what is known is that the Wagner Group is actively along the M-4 Railway, and has occupied Rostov, Voronezh, and Bugayevka. Noorullah (talk) 09:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

I meant Wagner. https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1672526876403695618 Ecrusized (talk) 09:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

@Ecrusized Yes, I haven't said against that. I showed on the map that Voronezh and Rostov were both occupied, and another source also says that they were driving to the capital via the M-4 Railway. Another source on twitter also says them with Bugayevka, linking here. [6] [7] Noorullah (talk) 09:54, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

However beyond that, nothing shows that they own further into the countryside beyond what is mentioned. I also plan to map the 2023 Belgorod Oblast attack on my map. Noorullah (talk) 09:56, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

See this as well [8] [9] Noorullah (talk) 09:58, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

@Ecrusized Do you see what I mean? Noorullah (talk) 10:06, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

No, I prefer the current version, as does every other user editing the file and the page. Please stop POV pushing. Ecrusized (talk) 10:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry but you are engaging in WP:ICANTHEARYOU, you are ignoring what is shown in those sources and then potraying a deliberately exaggerated map that does not source it claims in Luhansk, or especially much of the countryside compared to what is shown here. What you prefer does not matter and you claiming to speak on the behalf of every other user does not accomodate. @Ecrusized Noorullah (talk) 10:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

I am also seeing reports that they didn't occupy Voronezh though, and instead bypassed it. See here: [10] and heres a direct movement apparently: [11] Noorullah (talk) 10:12, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Risaldar Fateh Khan Khattak.

Make an article about Risaldar Fateh Khan Khattak. who work for the British. A legendary figure from the Guides history who distinguished himself at Mooltan. On receiving news of a raid on General Whish's camels, Risaldar Khan took the 70 men available to him to attack what he thought was a 20 strong party. They turned out to be 1200sikh, but undaunted, he galloped into the middle of them with his men, taking the enemy completely by surprise. Having come through that successfully, he turned them round and went in again, causing the whole lot of them to flee back to Mooltan. References.

https://www.britishempire.co.uk/forces/armyunits/corpsofguides/corpsofguidesfatteh.htm 2404:3100:1004:D908:1:0:8A80:3DA8 (talk) 04:13, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Noorullah21. Thank you for your work on Conquest of Kandahar. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! Hopefully you have a nice day today. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by creating an article.

As your article have adhered to the policies of Wikipedia, I have marked it as reviewed. However, the article is orphaned and require a link from other article.

Have a good day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

@SunDawn: Hi, thanks for letting me know. I just want to ask what does it exactly mean for a page to be “orphaned”, I don’t fully understand. Noorullah (talk) 06:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

It is likely when I reviewed the article, no other article is linked to your article. It could be also that I made mistake, as at present there are many other articles linking to your article. Have a good day! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

It turns out it is my mistake. Apologies for the mistake. Have a good day! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

@SunDawn: No problem, thanks for reviewing the article(s). Noorullah (talk) 07:38, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Ottoman–Hotaki War (1726–1727)

I found mention of a Battle of Isfahan on 8 November 1726. Ashraf Shah defeats the Ottomans.

"A Global Chronology of Conflict", Spencer C. Tucker, volume two:1500-1774, page 727.

Could that be the battle in the Ottoman-Hotaki War article? --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

@Kansas Bear I believe that could be it, you can source it. If it mentions its November it could also be it, but when I myself researched it I believe these are two (?) different battles. I haven't really checked into Hotak history but I can check later and try to add some citations. @Kansas Bear Noorullah (talk) 23:44, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

I will do some more digging and see what I can find. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:46, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

@Kansas Bear I'll start checking now and add anything I can find, and maybe even do a major expansion of the article. Noorullah (talk) 05:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Sounds good. I found nothing about a battle of Khoramabad on 20 November 1726. --Kansas Bear (talk) 14:38, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Figures, I found one, but the source Promises of Betrayals: The History That Shaped the Iranian Shia Clerics, Fazle Chowdhury, is not a reliable source. Chowdhury is a management consultant. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

@Kansas Bear Lol, good catch. If we used it, it would not be good. Noorullah (talk) 21:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

@Kansas Bear I found what was for the page Iranica that mentioned khorramabad and Erevan. So I placed that in the main article for now. I tried looking for sources to use like

"THE SCRAMBLE FOR IRAN: OTTOMAN MILITARY AND DIPLOMATIC

ENGAGEMENTS DURING THE AFGHAN OCCUPATION OF IRAN, 1722-1729"

But I couldn't find a link for it unfortunately, I used to have one, but it seems to have become a dead link now. Noorullah (talk) 21:36, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello sir check this article about a genrels

a some sikh mentioned false words int his article. Read kpk paragraphs and correct it and also add that har8 Singh fort was built by this genrel.and correct kpk paragraph. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paolo_Avitabile 2404:3100:1002:AA7E:1:0:DD7:E5E7 (talk) 07:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Khanate of Kalat. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Aoidh (talk) 12:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Noorullah21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Understanding my mistakes and what I could have done differently Noorullah (talk) 12:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Accepted per below. Aoidh (talk) 13:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

I see what I did that led to my block. I was edit warring the page and as a result was being disruptive to the content and material on the page. I read into how I can approach the situation(s) differently especially in a content dispute rather then edit warring. I intend to have a dispute resolution for the specific case on the Khanate of Kalat page, where the edit warring and content dispute arose from. With this, I hope the content of the article can be improved, and the dispute settled. I will not repeat the mistakes and use what I learned as a result of the block to expand Wikipedia. I am asking for your trust and another chance towards such. Thank you to whoever reads and considers this block appeal. Pinging the administrator who blocked me specifically. @Aoidh: Noorullah (talk) 12:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

• Comment - Since both of you have placed reasonable unblock requests on your talk pages I will be glad to unblock you so that discussion can continue if you can commit to not making any reverts of any kind for at least 24 hours (so that nobody goes even further into 3RR) and make an effort not to go back and forth edit warring until you reach a consensus one way or another on the article's talk page (you can use dispute resolution such as WP:3O if needed). It's also okay if you don't want to agree to that, another administrator can review the unblock request instead, whichever you'd prefer. Would you agree to that? - Aoidh (talk) 12:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

  @Aoidh I agree to this yes, I am just wondering you said not any reverts of any kind. I am assuming this just involves this content dispute and not other articles for the 24 hour period? I'm asking because this page on my watchlist was vandalized: Siege of Hazarajat. Noorullah (talk) 13:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

  Glad to hear it, I've unblocked you accordingly. As far as the reverting I specifically meant just the Khanate of Kalat article, and also please note that reverting (obvious and unambiguous) vandalism is exempt from the edit-warring policy. - Aoidh (talk) 13:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Noorullah21, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 00:55, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sher Shah Suri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jaunpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Shortened footnote error

In this edit to Sher Shah Suri you added a citation to "{{sfn|Chandra|2009|p=30-31}}". The article contains fully defined references for books he published in 2005 and 2007, but no target is defined for a book written in 2009. Please correct the shortened footnote or supply a corresponding complete citation. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

@Worldbruce Gotchya, thanks, will fix it. Noorullah (talk) 01:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Noorullah21. Thank you for your work on Second Anglo-Afghan Treaty (1857). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

@SunDawn: Hey, thanks for reviewing the page, and your nice comment, best wishes. Noorullah (talk) 14:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Rahon

Could you please take a look at Battle of Rahon, it is being disrupted by HaughtonBrit's IPs/proxies (he was also disrupting the page Battle of Jalalabad (1710). The battle led to eventual Mughal possession of the fort and repulsion of the Sikh attack, hence being a Mughal victory. It is being reverted on the basis that the Sikhs temporarily, for a few days, held control of the fort by defeating a minimal Mughal garrison after the Sikhs tactically retreated from the siege. HaughtonBrit says that Mughal recovery constitutes a "different battle", without applying that same logic to the Sikh recovery, as both were achieved under similar circumstances (defeats of belligerent garrisons after the initial siege had concluded). Please take a look. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 00:02, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Mirwais Hotak.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mirwais Hotak.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 12:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Revert on Rajput resistance to muslim conquests

This is regarding the revert on my edit on the page Rajput resistance to muslim conquests

I went through the soruce and it states that "Prithviraj himself, who had changed his elephant for a horse was swept away by the tide of fugitives, captured on the bank of sarasvati and put to death in cold blood, to appease Shihabuddin's wrath"

Firstly sarasvati river is a mythological river and even still no text mentions that prithviraj ran away from the battlefield, so I am reverting your edit.

Thank You Gspgoat (talk) 09:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

See , it mentions that he was captured after fleeing from the battle-field and then put to death. The only source per that source that seems to assert he died on the battle-field was the Virudha-vidhi vidhvansa. Noorullah (talk) 15:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Wazir Akbar Khan

Shouldn't this;

• "Wazīr Akbar Khān (Pashto/Dari: وزير اکبر خان ; 1816-1847), born Mohammad Akbar Khān (محمد اکبر خان) and also known as Amīr Akbar Khān (امير اکبر خان), was an Afghan prince..."
  

say "Barakzai prince" to avoid MOS:Ethnicity?--Kansas Bear (talk) 19:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

@Kansas Bear Yup, I'll make the change. Noorullah (talk) 22:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Sandbox

Hey @Noorullah21 is it cool if i can delete the info on my sandbox which contains information about dost mohammad khan? Im planning on working on a project so i sort of need my sandbox in order to work on it. Twarikh e Khalsa (talk) 21:29, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

@Twarikh e Khalsa All good, you can delete it. I already made another sandbox for it. Noorullah (talk) 23:58, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

@Noorullah21 thank you for letting me know. Twarikh e Khalsa (talk) 00:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Ramkani

!السلام علیکم

Creater of wikipedia page "Battle of Ramkani" Ronnie Macroni consider's this battle as victory for sikhs. As he texted on original wikipedia page, where you can see. I have attached the link of original page [12] this messege.

You edited page and change the result. You wrote that the battle was inconclusive.

So I have three questions.

1.

In which history book did you read that the battle of Ramkani was inconclusive?

2.

While historian Hari Ram Gupta clearly mantioned that Afghan army retreated from battlefield. And could not capture peshawer city. Was not it a defeat for Afghan army?

3.

Sikh army was fighting for defend peshawer city from Afghans. And successfuly defended.

Was not it a victory for Sikh army?

[13] 154.80.21.10 (talk) 15:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

😎 RaeesAbbas22 (talk) 08:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sher Shah Suri

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sher Shah Suri you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sangsangaplaz -- Sangsangaplaz (talk) 14:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sher Shah Suri

The article Sher Shah Suri you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sher Shah Suri for comments about the article, and Talk:Sher Shah Suri/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sangsangaplaz -- Sangsangaplaz (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Napoleon and Nadar Shah

Hello there

I reverted your edit because we are trying to save space in this article which is already too long. Napoloen might have read about Nadar Shah when he was a boy but he also read about Caesar, Alexander and Charlemagne, Ghengis Kan and many other conquerers. There is no reason to give undue emphasis to Nadar Shah. We need to provide information based on the consensus of reliable secondary sources. There is a vast literature on Napoleon and Nadar Shah is hardly mentioned as one of his childhood heroes. If you would like this information added, please start a conversation on the Talk Page and seek consensus.

Thank you Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 23:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your edits to Pashtuns. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 00:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar :) Noorullah (talk) 00:56, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Khalji Revolution

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Khalji Revolution you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 14:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Sher Shah Suri

On 11 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sher Shah Suri, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sher Shah Suri (pictured) was often referred to as the "Just King"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sher Shah Suri. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sher Shah Suri), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Valereee (talk) 00:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Khalji Revolution

The article Khalji Revolution you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Khalji Revolution and Talk:Khalji Revolution/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 14:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)