User talk:Niv.eno.nesohc

Alert for India/Pakistan/Afghanistan related articles[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Vengeance 01 (talk) 04:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I'm leaving this alert on multiple other editors to make sure everyone is aware that editor behavior is closely watched on these articles. Vengeance 01 (talk) 04:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Niv.eno.nesohc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Abhijit Bhaduri may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:36, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Mediocre But Arrogant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Falkirks^Talk 14:19, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Married But Available (Novel).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 12:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Married But Available (Novel) (December 19)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Married But Available (Novel).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Niv.eno.nesohc, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

February 2014[edit]

I have updated Medha Patkar page. Please review it and remove advert massage template.Anshul3Bansal (talk) 23:06, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Married But Available (Novel) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Married But Available (Novel), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Married But Available (Novel)[edit]

Hello Niv.eno.nesohc. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Married But Available (Novel)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Married But Available (Novel)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Tayi Arajakate. I noticed that you recently removed content from Siddharth Varadarajan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 13:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The cited reference no longer exists and connects to a 'Page not found' page. A proper reference / citation would be required there. Hence, removed the outdated link and requested for citation. Hope this clarifies. Pl do provide a right reference. Niv.eno.nesohc (talk) 15:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Caravan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 20:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citing a dead link as a reference is not unconstructive. Provide proper references then. Pl refrain from unnecessarily reverting edits without making the necessary corrections Niv.eno.nesohc (talk) 20:24, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you pl explain what is making you to unnecessarily revert edits when a clear reason is provided that the cited article is throwing the error 'Page not found'. Why are you not correcting the same and reverting the edit. Can this be explained? Niv.eno.nesohc (talk) 20:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The previous reply is in reference to the revert of edits done on the Siddharth Varadarajan page. With respect to Caravan magazine - pl compare the source cited by the earlier editor to the statement made on the article. Doesnt such a statement made require better sources. Or else, it will not seem neutral. Hope reasons provided for edits are read before responding on talk pages Niv.eno.nesohc (talk) 20:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The appropriate thing to do in case of a dead link is to tag it as a dead link, not to remove the citation itself and then add a citation needed tag, which gives the impression that it is unsourced. Same goes for the page on The Caravan, if you think it needs better sources then that's the tag you should use, not add a citation needed tag at an earlier part of the sentences which gives the impression that the part is unsourced. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 11:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial topic area alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 03:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]