User talk:Nikolaus maack

Changed it to the 3rd person. I doubt anyone cares or whatever. Stuff.--72.57.229.236 21:43, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Fred[reply]

I know I don't care. Yay! --Nik 12:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Nellis[edit]

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Nellis, which contains the archived debate. The main concerns were notability and verifiability. Mango juice^talk 19:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Mango. I've read it and responded. Hopefully we can get the article back, so I can fix it. --Nik 19:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear it. Because the content was an issue, the default position on Wikipedia is that you could recreate an article on Nellis if you want to, and I'm glad that you've learned something about WP standards. :) Since you've offered to work on it, I'll undelete the article and move it to User:Nikolaus maack/Andrew Nellis, where you can work on it until you think the issues have been dealt with. When you reach that point, you should open up a deletion review (I can help you do it, if you need help) and ask for recreation to be allowed. If you wanted to recreate the article from scratch there would be no need to go through that process.. but if you're basing the work on a version with POV and OR problems, it's best that the community agree those problems are dealt with. Mango juice^talk 20:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Serge Voronoff[edit]

Hi there. Thanks for your work on Serge Voronoff. I'm glad to see someone else is curiously fascinated by this topic! Apologies for not replying to your comments earlier. Would you like to work together to add more to the article? I hope to get it approved for appearing on DYK for April Fools Day! See Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know. Carcharoth 21:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

On 1 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Serge Voronoff, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ottawa Panhandlers Union[edit]

Did you know that you don't exist? The Panhandlers Union article has been deleted by Wikipedia administorator Blnguyen with the comment, "The result was Delete. socks ignored." Apparently you and the others who argued for keeping the article either don't exist or can be safely ignored. Welcome to Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SmashTheState (talk • contribs) 02:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Apples99. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. --Nik 18:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Inland Empire (film)[edit]

That wasn't the most constructive response you could have made. See Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (which some people refer to as WP:BITE). I've just removed the whole section. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 13:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which act is cruel -- jokingly responding with a light touch, or just deleting the entire section? I may have nibbled, but you appear to be the one who BITES away chunks of text. --Nik (talk) 13:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manliness[edit]

By all means, restore the reviews of manliness. The book was thoroughly trashed by everyone outside The Weekly Standard and the National Review.--208.58.202.116 (talk) 16:08, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Small world....[edit]

Responded to a comment you left on Linda Blair's talk page and, for the hell of it, clicked on your name and noticed you reside in Ottawa - wow, small world. Same here! Cheers, neighbor. Bishop969 (talk) 17:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]