Hi Networkccc, can you reply to this so we know you're a good faith editor and not a bot or a vandal or something? Mark Arsten (talk) 01:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blockedindefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia: your editing has largely consisted of gibberish or text without enough context for it to make sense, often with strings of unrelated pieces of text strung together in a meaningless and apparently random way, often with content totally unrelated to page titles, and with arbitrary complete rewrites changing pages to totally different topics, suggesting that your purpose here is use of Wikipedia as a free web host for experimentation or playing. Even more important, much if not all of the content you have posted has been made up of content copied from elsewhere, in unambiguous infringement of copyright. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Mobile broadband modem, you may be blocked from editing. Stop writing gibberish. — Smuckola(talk) 01:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
