User talk:Namuh007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Censorship of Jehovah's Witnesses articles[edit]

Hi, your edits at both the Jehovah's Witnesses and Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in Nazi Germany articles have been reverted. Your edits appear to be an attempt at censorship at worst, or whitewashing at best. Your attempts to remove critical material and turn these articles into one-sided promotional pieces will not succeed. Please understand that Wikipedia articles are based on reliable sources and both those articles are fair, balanced and accurate. If you persist, you will be reported to administrators for disruptive editing and you may be blocked from editing. BlackCab (TALK) 04:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looking further at your edit to the persecution article, it is clear your motives are entirely dishonest. Where it was reported that the respected German historian Detlef Garbe wrote: "Garbe says a 'relatively high number' of people signed the statement before the war, but 'extremely low numbers' of Bible Student prisoners did so in concentration camps in later years," you altered that to read: "Extremely low numbers of Bible Student prisoners did so." You have also removed two sections—using information based on Garbe's research—about Rutherford's letters to Hitler. These are incontrovertible facts provided by a historian with an impeccable record. You have simply removed them with the false accusation that "James Penton's statements are a highly inaccurate reflection of the relationship of Jehovah's Witnesses and the Nazi's", even though little of the material to which you object was actually from Penton's book. It is a cowardly and dishonest tactic to try to obliterate facts about the JWs' history with which you are uncomfortable. BlackCab (TALK) 05:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The statements ma

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Namuh007, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Jeffro77 (talk) 05:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]