User talk:Myth&Truth
Mahabharata index[edit]
I have created a workpage for you here: User:Myth&Truth/Mahabharata. You can work on this at your own pace without having to bother with keeping the live article in an acceptable shape. Once you are done, you can try including it in the live article.
I would suggest that a discussion of the individual sub-parvans should go to the articles on the individual parvans.
Note that we have articles on some parvans but not on others. E.g. Adi Parva exists and has a full list of sub-parvans. Sabha Parva exists but does not yet have such a list. Sauptika Parva at present does not exist at all.
If you want to help with this, I suggest you take Adi Parva as a template and bring the remaining seventeen articles on parvans to at least equal quality.
Please also try to help by putting Sanskrit terms into proper IAST. I.e. Mahābhārata for "Mahabharata", Ādi Parvan for "Adi Parva", etc.
For example, I see you have a list of the titles of the sub-parvans of Adi Parva.
- Anukramanika,Sangraha,Paushya,Pauloma,Astika,Adivansavatarana,Sambhava,Jatugrihadaha,Hidimbabadha,Baka-badha,Chitraratha,Swayamvara,Vaivahika,Viduragamana,Rajyalabha,Arjuna-banavasa,Subhadra-harana,Harana-harika,Khandava-daha,Maya-darsana parva
It turns out that the existing Adi Parva article was missing the first two titles. You want to
- complete the list in the Adi Parva article
- present proper references (WP:RS) for your information
- put the titles in proper IAST
- do the same for parvans 2-18.
cheers, --dab (𒁳) 14:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks,I think it will take a lot of time to complete 17 paravas and listing all 100 sub-parva.At present I should complete the list of sub-parva first,then giving references for them.--Myth&Truth (talk) 15:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Myth&Truth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear,Wikipedia Admins,I was already doing my work under some Admin dab,so that if I do some mistake or violate Wikipedia policy,he may revert it and instruct me.Dbachmann as a good Admin did so,he gave me useful instructions which was helpfull to me,But I see now that my Account has been blocked for keeping sock Account.I donot know what it is,But i Request wiki not to block any user on only ip basis,one ip is used by thousand of people daily.Like in my case 115.236-244.--.--,there exists 30 lacs user on it.I donot want you to unblock my account bcoz i have not so much time to do repeated request.Thank you
Decline reason:
It's obvious that you are User:Mkbdtu, the pattern of edits, language, behavior, IP etc., confirm this. You already had a chance when you created User:Mayurasia and started discussions like now, but the disruption resumed after the good faith. —SpacemanSpiff 05:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Myth&Truth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
dear wiki admin Spaceman spiff,Are You sure that I am sock of mkdbtu.Its surprising to me,Your are continuosly bolcking my ips and behaving to me in such a way that i am a terorist,I apologise you if You have some hard feeling for New users,cheers
Decline reason:
This does not address the reason for your block, which is your inappropriate use of multiple accounts. If you think you have solved the problems that made your block necessary, you should make your request on your original account's talk page- but be aware that, since the use of sockpuppets is inherently dishonest, people who use them often find it difficult to persuade administrators to believe any other claims related to unblock requests. You may have to accept that your time at Wikipedia is finished. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Making the request while logged out doesn't add credibility. Also, this sockpuppet account simply isn't going to be unblocked, because you already have an account. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Myth&Truth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
"Respected administrators,,i request you to give me last chance as a editor because ,i have understood that why i was blocked and i shall never repeat my mistakes ,i will not continue to cause damage or disruption,give me last chance,i will keep my promise ,i will make useful contributions instead,I am already doing work under Dbachmann. so,please unblock my account,give me last chance,i will give a lots of contribution to wikipedia,thank you"
Decline reason:
You'll need to apply for unblock from your original account. Further requests from this one will lead to suspension of talk page access. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.