User talk:Mutt Lunker/Archive 18

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

What are you doing?

Two questions;

1 - What is it you are wishing to achieve over at Scotland?
2 - What on earth is it you are actually on about?

See talk page discussion on the Scotland article which has highlighted areas of concern in the references. I have just spent a considerable amount of time trying to rectify this, all for you to, once again may I add, come in and totally destroy what it is I am trying to achieve here.

Care to explain yourself? I honestly don't know why I try. I honestly feel like you are a security guard that is actively patrolling my every move on here, and no matter what I do, or how many reliable references I provide, you will revert. And before you talk about that reference (https://monovisions.com/vintage-scotlands-landscapes-19th-century/) then please do not. Goodreg3 (talk) 00:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Ah hold on. Now the frequent reverts make sense. It appears you are making good use of your rollback abilities. Interestingly, Standard rollback may only be used in certain situations – editors who misuse standard rollback (for example, by using it to reverse good-faith edits in situations where an explanatory edit summary would normally be expected) may have their rollback rights removed. I would argue that all my edits are in good faith, and not always in agreement with why you have to revert the edit in its entirety. Unless my rollback theory makes sense, of course. Goodreg3 (talk) 01:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

As before, as it's about the article, it should be dealt with at the article. Mutt Lunker (talk) 01:21, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

kunghibbe

Don't know the right way to go about this but I found him (her?) again here.18abruce (talk) 14:14, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, I've rolled back these edits for now. May report them but they'll no doubt reappear under another guise. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)