User talk:Murriemir

Edit for user page

World War II: 2-Close for Comfort I found ww2 interesting because hitler could have won. he made three fatal mistakes as a general. 1.)left 20k of the british army escape via the france invasion. After this event britain was superior in the air unlike ww1 which was unexpected. 2.)Barbarossa was set back because of the Italian invasion of greece. Italy made many dumb mistakes. 3.)got greedy and tried to take another greek province (the greeks are heavy fighters when outnumbered but never invade due to lack of organization) stalingrad because of the oil reserve upon the caucus straits and ural steppe. The supplies is what destroyed the advance. From what i gather, lack of resources ran out, therefore the oil reserves in the ukraine, ignoring stalingrad, and weapon cache shipments could have kept the luftewaffe in the air, mostly in warmer weather. If he went straight for moscow, stalingrad could be a north-south american independence type issue (eg same with the american civil war, yet the confederates capital was taken instead because of one or two false moves by an even worst general, lee). They abandoned blitzkrieg warfare all together when taking provincial cities. It should be hit-bang-hit, or reap and sow then reap again. Even if he didn't invade russia, he may have won later. I don't condone killing and believe the war machine must be broken, but maybe the bad people, like 2% of the world were just being weeded out to make room for things to come, afterall its a matter of acting with the soul or not, who knows. Either that, or the civilian population def deserve to suffer or be controlled eg punished somehow because of its lack of compassion. I do not consider humanity and war a threat however, if supervised or governed by a higher force. In the end, the technology was there, just not used effectively enough eg obtaining oil tankers or drops instead of rerouting the army into the south caucus oilfields for entrapment in the concrete wall called Stalingrad. That's life, civilizations either win or lose, sometimes they lose sadly this is how europe became many countries in the first place. Finally, wwII is exposed. Basically, they never reverted back to their blitzkrieg tactic when taking problematic towns and major cities eg to break through and escape entrapment which hitler did not order paulus upon encirclement of the stalingrad suburbs. A correct way to control a division is to regroup and spearhead a city with the whole army. The 'slug formation' that was the third reich upon the russian step split-up into many groups and factions! It is also how the ottoman empire was created and destroyed. Nazi germany actually DID conquer the north of the soviet union for a small amount of time. They stalled, an american western trait when faced with the enemy to somehow 'trick' them upon the steps of moscow is however stupid. You either move, break through and take position or fail. The moscow town and the 30-mile stall like stalingrad was a win or lose scenario. Either push forward or don't. Hitler was a very western general and admire of america here. WWII was probably an extension of the american civil war actually. Urban warfare is brutal when confined and planes destroyed, because they took the city far too late or simply just got stuck. The american/russian propaganda you see is because a civilization was virtually destroyed or leveled. What's interesting is this is also how america was created, sociologically and technoligically speaking ofcourse.

PS: I would site (copy paste) most information here under the battle for moscow user talk page.

Notable Mistakes Caught

Meditarnian was in central russia, still in the same place before the pole shift, however Africa moved down, which I thought was Europe. Europe did not move South, but Africa however as a series of Islands did. Another reference is the hypothetical location of Mount Sumeru and Meru. Both different mountains. Mount Sumeru is Mount Kailash, bird paradise. Mount Meru however is not Mount Sumeru. Mount Meru is located in the north pole at the center of the globe. My mistake was saying the wetlands moved the islands. They did move and create the mountains of the Ural, however just simply flooded the place, and did not effect the location of europe which was in central russia at the time. I simply cant tell the future, i dont know if Kailash will be south or north after the fifth pole shift.

~yes, true ignoramus but you must understand that atlantis is tracked by via civilization. Africa goes to israel, israel goes to india, india spreads into the human race. Now if you have a small island like sumatra my fine fured friend, you will have your genome! Pls refute me later. Atlantis is asian therefore you degenerated from a lemur for quite sometime. The Giants left you to breed in sumatra via atlantis through africa! The true cainanites are the greeks themselves whom made an ice-age caveman out of themselves. As well, the blood brothers of cain are indeed greek in origin! The cromagnums followed your giant hybrid traitor of a friend through the slavic kingdoms. This sumeria you speak of, is the last jericho or the garden of eden within a circle they created, Jericho! For the jews and a monkey named jehovah. Let this enter your minds..death and more death. Your race in your present form and mind, only a few hundred thousand years old! Be kind to the bush-finned trouts in fighting spirit, for you may enter it forever!!!

Notability of Asuramaya

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Asuramaya, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Asuramaya seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Asuramaya, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:50, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Terrorforms.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Terrorforms.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 18:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Generation Q

I have nominated Generation Q, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation Q. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ZS 06:01, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Driftflorida1.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Driftflorida1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet] [talk] 11:27, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Asteroid.svg.png

Thank you for uploading File:Asteroid.svg.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Astronomical-conjunction_symbol.png

Thank you for uploading File:Astronomical-conjunction_symbol.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Astronomical_meteor_symbol.png

Thank you for uploading File:Astronomical_meteor_symbol.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Meteor_symbol.png

Thank you for uploading File:Meteor_symbol.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:29, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Atlantic Hook for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Atlantic Hook, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantic Hook until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Atlantic Hook

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Atlantic Hook, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 00:07, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of In Our Country's Defense

The article In Our Country's Defense has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references ("In Our Country's Defense" Zaitsev) only found a single published (gBooks) hit which is a minor mention in the novel War of the Rats By David L. Robbins, Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Cheese

Hello and welcome. Please don't make edits that say cheese is a meat product because it has rennet. Hamburgers have lettuce, but that doesn't make a hamburger a vegetable. Thanks for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:56, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sabrejaw1.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sabrejaw1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 14:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Sabredogato.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sabredogato.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 14:24, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charybdis (comics)

The article Charybdis (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The fictional character, as a stand-alone subject, does not meet the general notability guideline and the content of the article is a plot-only description of a fictional work.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jfgslo (talk) 01:59, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Murriemir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

69.255.42.105 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Asfdg". The reason given for Asfdg's block is: "Vandalism".

• Blocking administrator: Materialscientist (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: What Beeblebrox said, below. Socking is not permitted. TNXMan 22:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

What is your relationship with User:Ebayfixu and User:Asfdg, since you've been editing the same articles (EBay and Criticism of eBay)? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

That certainly doesn't look like a coincidence to me, I would say the autoblock is working as intended and you have just outed yourself for sock or meat puppetry. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:14, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Removal of content

About your resent edits to Lunar theory, Lemuria (continent), Features of the Marvel Universe, and List of locations of the DC Universe:

• Please review the Terms of Use which are part and parcel of editing Wikipedia and is liked on the edit page. This is important with regard to the following.
• You do not own content you add to Wikipedia, please do not act as if you do.
• Removal of content can be seen as vandalism unless a valid reason for its removal can be presented.

This type of editing, or the vandalism engaged in at Talk:Communism, can result in you being blocked from editing.

- J Greb (talk) 02:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Chatting on talk pages

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Cruelty to animals for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. --Pitke (talk) 05:36, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Marvel Universe subterranean races for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Marvel Universe subterranean races is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Marvel Universe subterranean races until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 07:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Energy-Eater

Is this a sobriquet for the Galactic Golem or another creature in the DCU? If it's the former, it doesn't belong on the list, but if it's the latter, do you know when it first appeared? I'm trying to (slowly :-)) identify all characters and your help would be greatly appreciated.jtmatbat (talk) 07:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk: Punk rock are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 21:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Your user and talk space edits

Hi. After reverting your recent edit at Talk:Punk rock I took a glance at your user page and through your contributions, and I think that somehow, despite having edited here for almost 6 years, you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the purpose of user and talk spaces. Nearly all of your talk page edits consist of you opining or theorizing on the general topics of the articles in question; rarely if at all do you seem to discuss the content of the articles themselves or how to improve them. As has been pointed out to you previously, Wikipedia is not a forum: Article talk pages are for discussing improvements to the articles, not for expressing general opinions or theories about the articles' topics (by the same token, user talk pages are for discussing user behavior and directly Wikipedia-related matters, not for further opining and theorizing about general topics). Also, your user page is nearly 58KB of theories, opinions, and diatribes about various scientific, historical, and religious matters, and conspiracy theories. While a reasonable amount of biographical information and discussion of your interests is permitted—and generally expected—on your user page, your user page is not a blog, and extensive personal opinions on matters unrelated to Wikipedia is a violation of the user page guidelines. I certainly don't wish to irk you, as you've also made many contributions to articles and done plenty of good-faith work, but I respectfully ask that you remove this superfluous content from your user page and limit your talk page comments to direct discussion of Wikipedia's articles, rather than your personal opinions, theories, and observations. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 22:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Cat, you may be blocked from editing. Danger ^{High voltage!} 00:18, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Features of the Marvel Universe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Orion

Maverick (comics) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marvel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Black Brigade

List of Marvel Universe characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 2-D

List of teams and organizations in DC Comics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Jury

Russian films of 2011 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Only You

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=my mistake, lack of evidence in article}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 09:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I came here after seeing this edit. You've been warned enough times not to do this. It is my opinion that you should remain blocked until you can convince another Administrator that this behavior will stop. I also think you need to agree to use edit summaries. Dougweller (talk) 09:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Murriemir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

76.100.60.164 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Murriemir". The reason given for Murriemir's block is: "Disruptive editing".

• Blocking administrator: Dougweller (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: Procedural decline: Inappropriate template - you are blocked directly. Please use {{unblock}}. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

You don't get to remove the block notice. Doing so can get you ability to edit this page revoked. - J Greb (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

This editor has been evading the block, continuing the behaviour that was the reason for the block in the first place. Another Admin has protected his/her userpage which was being used as a blog. I've blocked the IP address. Dougweller (talk) 05:47, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Spark accelerator for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spark accelerator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spark accelerator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jim1138 (talk) 05:33, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Pyre (character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pyre (character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyre (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 01:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Asteroid234.svg.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Asteroid234.svg.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Willy1018 (talk) 14:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Astronomical-conjunction symbol234.png

The file File:Astronomical-conjunction symbol234.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Meteor symbol234.png

The file File:Meteor symbol234.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lasma

The article Lasma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 21:34, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Golden Knight

The article Golden Knight has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 00:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Prince Evillo

The article Prince Evillo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 13:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Prince Evillo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prince Evillo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Evillo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 15:11, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of X'Hal

The article X'Hal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 15:22, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Citadel (comics)

The article Citadel (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 11:55, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Myriad (DC Comics)

The article Myriad (DC Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 17:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Morphea (comics)

The article Morphea (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 11:50, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Construct (comics)

The article Construct (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 00:19, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Council (comics)

The article The Council (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:11, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The Council (comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Council (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Council (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clawster

The article Clawster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:13, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Loose Cannon (character)

The article Loose Cannon (character) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Note to closer: instead of regular deletion, I propose softdeletion by simply redirecting this to List of DC Comics characters: L; ping me and I'll add the lead there as a new section. Also ping User:BOZ in case you think AfD is better. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:07, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of partnerships in fiction

The article List of partnerships in fiction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced list that fails WP:LISTN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 22:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of partnerships in fiction

The article List of partnerships in fiction has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:46, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of hidden races in DC Comics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of hidden races in DC Comics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hidden races in DC Comics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)