User talk:Muraad kahn

Welcome!

Hello, Muraad kahn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Please also check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladesh --Ragib 11:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Hamidullah.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hamidullah.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:IAA5280.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:IAA5280.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:02, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:IAA5282.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:IAA5282.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh 1971[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Bangladesh 1971, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.brainyencyclopedia.com/encyclopedia/b/ba/bangladesh_liberation_war.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Banner home.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Banner home.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please, don't do this[edit]

You have already blanked Bangladesh War Of Independence 1971 once and Bangladesh Liberation War three times. Please, don't do this. I know, you have put a lot of effort into the former article, but the later article is a result of huge discussions and collaborations, and is deemed to be the one to stay. If you have an objection, please, state it on the talk page of Bangladesh Liberation War. If you want to make a constructive contribution, you can do it to that article. It is always highly welcome. But, destructive editing like what you've been doing is considered vandalism, and is not appreciated.

Remember, it is possible to block you and the IP that is doing the same as you are, and it is also possible to protect both the articles from editing by new or anonymous users. Neither is a healthy action, and is used only as a last resort. If you need help understanding Wikipedia editing, you can always ask for help. If you don't know where to ask, just post the request on this page. Once again, welcome to Wikipedia. May your edits grace us for better and for a long time to come. Thanks. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 14:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Bangladesh War Of Independence 1971. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ^Ariel♥Gold 13:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bangladesh Liberation War, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 14:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone tell me who removed my contribution, and who ever did I want it back in its original form!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Muraad kahn (talk • contribs)

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Bangladesh War Of Independence 1971. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. ^Ariel♥Gold 14:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would just like to know who took my contributions out and under what judgement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Muraad kahn (talk • contribs)

Bangladesh War Of Independence 1971‎[edit]

(Repeating notice given to the IP address)

Regarding your edits regarding the redirect of Bangladesh Liberation War into the above page:

Wikipedia is not a collection of duplicate articles with different viewpoints, and making them is considered a POV fork. Please review neutrality and Wikipedia:redirects to explain why there is only one copy. Regarding your opinions of the original article, one of the core policies of Wikipedia is neutrality, which is backed up by verifiability and reliable, third-party sources. If you have issues with the article's view, please discuss your concerns on the article's talk page with the community. Thank you, ^Ariel♥Gold 14:50, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Ed (Edgar181) 14:51, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop, immediately[edit]

Why are you vandalizing the Bangladesh Liberation War article? At least half a dozen editors, all highly experienced, have decided to redirect the article you created. That article stood aganist Wikipedia guidelines and policies, and indiscriminate article creation is never a good idea for anything, not even your own blog. If you really want your article to be on the net you can always do that outside of Wikipedia. There is nothing wrong in it. If you think your article is more important than Wikipedia, then you're wrong. And, if you think it's game that you can keep doing destructive edits and get away with it, you're even more wrong. Your enthusiasm in the subject is highly commendable, all you need is to channel that enthusiasm to positive edits. It's shame to see enthusiastic new editors to be banned. BTW, your edits to the Bangladesh Liberation War article are ruining it. Can't you notice that yet? Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 14:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you all decided to vandalise Bangladesh War of Independence 1971 article. I am fully aware of some of the mistakes there, I was in the process of fixing them by the day. Now because your half a dozen, well lets make it a two dozen highly experienced editors, think they know more about a war that I FOUGHT, COMMANDED AND WITNESSED. WELL THEN IF THAT IS THE CASE then I am guilty as charged for doing what I have done, just be decent and WIKI enough to atleast e-mail my contribution that has been blanked and redirected for wiki's personal no good reason at sonnykahn69@hotmail.com. For your information what had happened in Bangladesh 1971 was Bangladesh's INDEPENDENCE WAR and NOT LIBERATION WAR. Bangladesh was not under slavery, that it needed to be freed. And let me ask you under what basis did you all Wikinius's think that Bangladesh War of Independence 1971 article was indiscriminate and destructive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Muraad kahn (talk • contribs)

Muraad, I would again request that you review some of the core policies here on Wikipedia. For one, neutrality. Articles must be written without any opinion or commentary offered by the editor. The fact that you fought in the war, and your responses here, would suggest that you're going to have a very hard time remaining neutral with this issue, as to me, at least, you seem quite passionate about it. Additionally, statements in articles must be verifiable by reliable, third-party sources, which generally mean news articles, reports, etc. While journalists are not always neutral themselves, they do at least have the credibility to support statements given, as one of the core values of journalism is research of fact. When something negative is stated, editors will usually say "as the news agency reported, (statement)" and then cite it with a footnote for reference. As to your concern of the word "liberation" vs. "Independence", let's examine the definitions: Liberation: to free (as a country) from domination by a foreign power. Independent: not dependent: as: not subject to control by others (In this case, Pakistan). Both of those terms are descriptive of what the war involved, Bangladesh's freedom (independence). Review the conversations on the article's talk page, to see why the article was redirected. As to why your edits were not constructive, again, because creating two articles of the same subject, with different viewpoints, is a POV fork and not acceptable. I really would encourage you to step back, take a deep breath, and realize that Wikipedia is a global project, with millions of editors from around the globe, who are working hard to create an encyclopedia of facts, backed by references, written neutrally. Read through the core policies, the guidelines given here, and I hope you'll come to realize the goal is to improve things, which you're more than welcome to do, but I'd suggest that you discuss any controversial edits you make on the talk page, and you need to cite your sources when adding material. I really hope that this helps clear things up for you, ^Ariel♥Gold 15:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great Disguise. Regardless, your so called wiki experts have compiled on so called BANGLADESH LIBERATION is nothing more than JUST an article. I should have realised. No wonder journalists, schools, historians and scholars including research groups so much despises and discourages Wiki as a source. I will extend their effort as far as I possibly can. I totally lost my imagination trying to be a part of it. But a commend does warrant on all your sinuous, labyrinth of bias (THIS IS ONLY PRETAINING TO YOUR ARTICLE ON BANGLADESH LIBERATION). I officially apologise for all the trouble and pain that I may have caused you. I promise that I will steer clear from unWikifying and undermining your expert work. By all means march on. And further, may be this is a little unwikifying but would you be kind enough to delete or close out my account or place me on permanent blockage however you do it. If I need to myself just fill me in please. Thank you.

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Banner home.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Banner home.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Banner short.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Banner short.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Memorial3.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Memorial3.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting[edit]

Hello, just a little reminder: redirects work like #REDIRECT [[]]

Regards, De728631 (talk) 01:36, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please Stop[edit]

Dear Muraad, would you please STOP replacing any mention of "Bangladesh Liberation War" with "Bangladesh War of Independence"? You are doing it at a lot of articles, and also messing up the infoboxes. PLEASE STOP. Thank you. --Ragib (talk) 20:12, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. --Ragib (talk) 02:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Muraad kahn! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Muhammad Hamidullah Khan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jagadish Chandra Bose. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Faking quotes is not acceptable. Huon (talk) 15:45, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BBC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armed Forces Day (Bangladesh), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wing Commander and BAF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Infobox country

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:57, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Muhammad Hamidullah Khan

added links pointing to BDF, Model Town, Mirpur and Sreenagar

Abu Taher

added links pointing to JSD, BDF and EAM

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Ctg4Rahat. Your recent edit to the page Ziaur Rahman appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 15:22, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Executive Office of the President of the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Office of the [[National Security Advisor (United States)|National Security Advisor]* [[Domestic Policy Council]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:11, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muhammad Hamidullah Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BAF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

M. A. G. Osmani

added a link pointing to BDF

South Bay, Los Angeles

added a link pointing to Long Beach

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ziaur Rahman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BDF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Ziaur Rahman, you may be blocked from editing. Rahat (Message) 10:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:18, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite[edit]

A Barnstar!

Please participate

There's a voting going on here. It needs to close, but consensus is not certain. We need more participation. The issues can't remain without a resolution. Please, check it out. Closure of the discussion has started. (refresh) Please, hurry. 78.149.193.255 (talk) 16:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

In addition to the editing problems which you have already received messages about, and which have led to your twice being blocked, I see there are also various other problems, which as far as I can see have never been mentioned to you. For example, 52 times you have made edits using edit summaries that say "Fixed typo". I have checked a sample of about 20 of those edits, and I found only one that could reasonably regarded as correcting a typo. Most of the edits made significant changes to articles, in ways which you must have known would be likely to be controversial. Here are a few of the more extreme examples: [1] [2] [3]. It is very difficult to believe that this was done in good faith: it looks like a calculated attempt to mislead other editors about the nature of your editing. That unambiguous evidence of dishonest intentions, combined with all the other problems in your editing history, lead me to now give you the following warning: if I see any more disruptive, dishonest, uncollaborative, or unconstructive editing from you, I shall very seriously consider whether to block you indefinitely from editing, without further notice. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Muraad kahn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammad Abdul Monjur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BDF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited All Pakistan Awami Muslim League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Awami Muslim League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:16, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]