User talk:Monkia Rane

This is Monkia Rane's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kegel Balls (July 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Festucalex were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Kegel exercise. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kegel Balls and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

〜 Festucalex • talk 08:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Monkia Rane! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 〜 Festucalex • talk 08:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Kegel exercise, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Zefr (talk) 14:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

itspleazure.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.itspleazure.com
kaamastra.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.kaamastra.com

Your draft article, Draft:Kegel Balls[edit]

Hello, Monkia Rane. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kegel Balls".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vibrating Dildo (February 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Your sources are fake.

Qcne (talk) 11:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, they are not fake, I'm adding the citations along with the sources which have the product in question. Monkia Rane (talk) 12:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you add three fake sources to begin with and then submit it for review? Please explain your thinking behind that. Qcne (talk) 12:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Sex shop. Loytra (talk) 22:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 17:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]