User talk:Mojobadshah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.

If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the many help pages.

  • Google: Wikipedia is very well indexed by Google. Searching for a term, even about an editing question, followed by "wiki" or "wikipedia" usually pulls up what you need.


Where next?[edit]

  • If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
  • If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
  • If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
  • For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page or the Wikipedia:Teahouse page could be your next stop!

See also[edit]

Good luck and happy editing.```Buster Seven Talk 22:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

YOUR EDIT IN ARYAN PAGE[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalise Aryan page or any other wiki articles, you will be blocked from editing.Rajkris (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aryan. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dawn Bard (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aryan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:01, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Aryan does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 23:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Aryan. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:24, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mojobadshah, you have been evidently warned twice in February 2013 for your edits of the Aryan page, and you have received two further warnings now, all from different editors. You should take this message to heart and calm down. Please indicate on the Talk:Aryan page, with clear and succinct posts and reliable sources with page numbers, what your concerns are. The lead only summarizes the article.
    1. So, you need to read the article and mention the points in the article that should be highlighted in the lead.
    2. If there are any points that are missing in the article, please mention them separately.
Huge WP:Walls of text such as these are counter-productive. Please keep in mind also that Aryanism is a form of racism. It is nothing to be proud of. - Kautilya3 (talk) 10:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA notification[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Kautilya3 (talk) 12:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Aryan. Mlpearc (open channel) 00:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aryan Religion (November 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Aryan religion instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:05, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magic (religion) (November 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yash! was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yash! 05:32, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magic (religion) (November 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SwisterTwister kindly provide me which some specific suggestions a to how I can improve on the content provided to this wikipedia article so that the content is sufficient enough to meet your needs. Thank you. Mojobadshah (talk) 10:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Magic (religion) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Magic (religion). Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 08:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magic (religion) (November 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cult of Green was:
There are large sections of content that have no source at all and issues raised in previous reviews have not been addressed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Cult of Green (talk) 05:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Magic (religion) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Magic (religion). Thanks! Cult of Green (talk) 23:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Magic (religion) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Magic (religion). Thanks! Cult of Green (talk) 23:57, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avesta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aryan religion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Magic and religion may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • revelation communicated to the prophet through visions. The root of the word is ''di'', "to see" [preserved in the modern Persian ''didan'', "too see;" [...]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Magic and religion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aryan religion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing on The Faiths of the Founding Fathers[edit]

On the presumption that the first edit I reverted was done by you while you were not logged in, you are now over the three edit limit. Your addition is unsourced, and frankly, it's not particularly coherent. Mangoe (talk) 21:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First of all my edit was sourced. And secondly if your assertion that my addition is not coherent is blatantly subjective. You need to explain why the addition is incoherent or leave that edit in. You're just trying to push some totally erroneous Christian propaganda. You're trying to deny the obvious fact that Founding Father's weren't even Christian which is contingent on the fact that the Constitution is an authoritative legal document that denies the central authority in the NT - Jesus Christ. And unless you can prove that the Founders were referring to Jesus Christ when they make references to either "God" or our "Creator" you better leave my addition in this article. Not only will I make a complaint to wikipedia, but I'll file a complaint against you personally with the Courts.Mojobadshah (talk) 23:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To begin with, making a legal threat is the fast track to getting blocked. Second, your response here comes across as your personal and idiosyncratic theory. Certain of the FFs can be identified as committed churchmen; others held unorthodox views; for most the evidence is noncommittal or entirely lacking. No real legal scholar is going to hold the constitution as promulgating the denial you ascribe to it. Third, a Facebook page is simply not going to cut it as an authoritative or reliable source.
Find some books or scholarly articles and cite them; then you might have something to stand on. If you persist in simply reinserting roughly the same passage, you will eventually be blocked. Mangoe (talk) 23:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First of all sir, I am a legal scholar. Second of all what legal scholars might you be referring to? Can you provide me with some background on all the legal scholars that you are referring to in the context of the religious community that they identify with because I hope you're not referring to "Christian" legal scholars and that you are at the very least inclusive of non-Christian scholars when you say "legal scholars." Second of all I cited my sources - 2 sources 1.) an article posted by the ACHF and 2.) an article from the press. And lastly what makes my determination idiosyncratic and yours not? Its all good and well that someone wrote a book pointing out what religious institutions or communities the Founding Fathers identified, but the its a well-established fact that none of them were genuinely Christian at all and to say that there is no evidence of that is completely deluded and bordering on treasonous. If you're going to state that the founders identified with Christianity there also must be an indication to the readers that the Constitution itself was not a Christian document or a document derived from Christianity because the legal prescription contained in the founding documents goes outside the bounds of Christian textual sources, which further begs the question: how is that not a denial of Christianity. Were the Founders party to the Founding documents or not.. which prescribed rules and laws foreign to Christian textual sources? Kindly respond. Mojobadshah (talk) 16:02, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you are a legal scholar, then you may cite your published work. I've been looking at the religion of the FFs for a very long time, and I say that your statements about their irreligiosity are untrue, because when I eliminate anti-Christian partisans, I find it easy to cite that (for instance) Alexander Hamilton and Samuel Adams were active churchmen. As far as I have found, only Thomas Paine can be cited definitively as a deist, in spite of many attempts to claim others. there are many figures (e.g. Madison) about whom there is essentially nothing to go on. Probably the most important FF w.r.t. the Bill of Rights, George Mason, has been described as exhibiting "conventional piety" as an Anglican of the day, but he was fiercely opposed to establishment and supportive of religious tolerance, the latter issue being dear to many pious Congregationalists, Quakers, and Catholics.
At any rate, you've insisted on insertion of an essay which I frankly do not find composed of coherent English, but which in an case isn't supported by any reference to an outside authority. I don't think this essay is relevant to an article about a book: such an article needs to describe the book and the scholarly reaction to it, and nothing else. But wherever your addition appears, you need at least to correct these two faults. Mangoe (talk) 18:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Draft:Magic (religion) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Magic (religion), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Magic (religion)[edit]

Hello, Mojobadshah. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Magic".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin Let's talk! 09:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mojobadshah&oldid=1077717678"