User talk:MillsReciprocity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Greetings to any Wikipedia reviewers and editors. Any assistance on the submitted wiki page, Evolutionary psychology of non-kin group interactions, is welcome. MillsReciprocity (talk) 18:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MillsReciprocity, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi MillsReciprocity! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Evolutionary psychology of non-kin group interactions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:OR content fork of Reciprocal altruism.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evolutionary psychology of non-kin group interactions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionary psychology of non-kin group interactions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]