User talk:Milant

Notes to myself[edit]

Notes to myself: these articles are far away from encyclopedial: Montenegrins, Serbophobia (done), Yugoslavs ... --Milan Tešovic 01:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

speak[edit]

pa pričaj srpski da te ceo svet razume! --TheFEARgod 17:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ok, then help me in improving and protecting from vandalism Serbian-Albanian Conflict--TheFEARgod 17:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mapa[edit]

Pa ne bih baš da crtam mapu velike Srbije, jer taj članak o velikoj Srbiji ovde (kao i mapa) služi kao propaganda hrvatskih i bošnjačkih nacionalista protiv srpskog naroda, i ne želim da im u tome pomažem. Šešelj je i bio jedini koji je predlagao mapu velike Srbije tokom devedesetih godina i ona mapa u članku je upravo ta koju je predložio Šešelj. Ne znam da je neko drugi predlagao još neku mapu velike Srbije (ako ne računamo onu koju su predložili četnici u drugom svetskom ratu). PANONIAN (talk) 02:33, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pa vidiš, ja mislim da je najbolje da tamo bude ta mapa koju je predložio Šešelj (sa naznakom da je on taj koji je to predložio). Kao što rekoh, Šešelj i jeste jedini koji je to predložio tokom devedesetih, i samim tim im je ova teza o velikoj Srbiji na klimavim nogama, jer nikako ne mogu dokazati ono što pokušavaju, a to je da je težnja ka velikoj Srbiji opšte raspoloženje u Srbiji. Onaj ko je tu mapu velike Srbije predložio ima svoje ime i prezime, i to treba da piše uz tu mapu. Sa druge strane, Dado i kompanija te neće pustiti da mapu velike Srbije obrišeš odatle, pa ako imaš živaca da se raspravljaš sa njima, srećno. :) PANONIAN (talk) 21:36, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pa sad sigurno ne vredi raspravljati šta se moglo stvoriti 1945 ili 1991. To što imamo imamo, i treba ga čuvati da nam i to što imamo ne uzmu, jer ima ih koji bi i to hteli. :) PANONIAN (talk) 23:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zadar[edit]

Mozes li pogledati sledece glasanje o clanku 'Kristalna noc u Zadru' [1]. Clanak ce biti obrisan u protivnom, kao sto se uklanjaju i ostala svedocanstva o stradanju Srba - uprkos svim dokazima i linkovima. Hvala.

Nemanyya 05:16, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't understand what nazi-shovinism you're talking about. The only thing I was doing is reverting bosniak serbophobic arguments...--TheFEARgod 22:54, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ne bavim se time, --TheFEARgod 23:00, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Bosniak sentiment[edit]

Following the reaction by some wikipidean to losing the AfD vote on Serbophobia, this article has been created. I have nominated it for deletion. Your views on the issue will be welcome. Asterion 18:45, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:151203 sutomore.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:151203 sutomore.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 18:18, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Improvement Belgrade[edit]

You may wish to vote for Belgrade at the Article Improvement Drive page, here. --estavisti 21:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[edit]

Hello! I invite you to join the WikiProject Serbia. All the best, --serbiana - talk 02:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

може[edit]

Ово сада је глупост, "non-clinical sense"... Али сада постоје Anti-Bosniak sentiment и Anti-Croatian sentiment, па ваљда неће бити тих проблема. --estavisti 18:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Serbophobia[edit]

Reverting an article to (basically) the version from months ago without any explanation or discussion is practically vandalism. People, including me, have been doing their best to add information and keep it NPOV. Don't you see that you are provoking a new edit war? If you push your POV in this way, the Bosniaks, the Croats and the Albanians (and probably some admins) will start their POV-pushing again, and the result will be an extreme anti-Serbian version for at least one half of the time. Do you care about what's good for Wikipedia and for Serbia's reputation, or are you willing to sacrifice both in order to satisfy your urge to wage (edit) wars? --85.187.44.131 10:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I must answer here, because I have no idea who you are. That is an improved version of an article. Somebody deleted the changes, so I putted them back. That vandalism? --Milan Tešovic 13:35, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CG Wikipedia[edit]

Hey Milant, there is currently a vote for a version of Wikipedia in Montenegrin. If you want to vote, go to meta:Requests for new languages. There you can vote. Ask your friends on Wikipedia (if you have any) who haven't voted to vote. Thanks. Crna Gora ^{(Talk/Contribs/Edit Count)} 21:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know that there is a second vote for a version of Wikipedia in Montenegrin. The link is meta:Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Montenegrin 2. By the way, I invite you to join WikiProject Montenegro. --Crna Gora 01:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

slobo[edit]

I was skimming over the talk page at Milosevic (I don't know why... a desire to get frustrated? who knows) anyway, I saw your comment about the talk page simply being a forum for angry people to vent and you leaving (something along those lines), and I chuckled to myself and left... wo/ that comment I was in danger of going through the entire talk page... so thanks! :) Maîtresse 10:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Criminal Milo Djukanovic[edit]

Committed criminal acts with the same magnitude of Slobodan Milosevic, I think it qualifies that most surely. --PaxEquilibrium 20:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are correct; sorry for the (other) revert.

Milo is a tycoon (you know it too). A simple question: did he achieve that much wealth through criminal activities? Answer:YES. Not only cigarettes-smuggling, but also sex-slave trafficking, selling prostitutes! There's also weapons dealing to the eastern extremist armed forces.

During the war his cabinet managed the Siege of Dubrovnik, entirely raided Konavle (stealing numerous flocks of cows). Then there's also violation of human rights - 350 Croats were executed in the infamous POW camp neat Tivat. 200 Bosnian Muslim refugees were rounded up and delivered to the Serb forces in Bosnia directly by his order.

Milo is constantly at odds with Montenegro's Albanian and Bosniac minorities (working even at times against them), and now even with the Serbs too.

No, unlike many, I'm not a sheepish fool (I never voted for neither Milosevic nor Djukanovic); I simply will never believe to an aggressive Serbian nationalist that funnels himself using propaganda and hatred against Croats, territorial expansion on other states and then says that "he's sorry" and how he was "forced" into doing so, becoming a Montenegrin nationalist and even more (the rest of the story you know). Sadly, the people are sheep (read: sheeple) and that's what kept Milosevic in power up to 2000 and even more tragically, keeps Djukanovic in power up to this very day.

I hope you understand and do not allow the curtain to fall upon your eyes too. Cheers, brother. --PaxEquilibrium 22:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Considering I perfectly know Croatian (Serbo-Croat), sure I know it.

He sure did achieve enough to fund organized crime and be a mobster in a way.

If such is the case, why is Croatia just know filing a suit Croatia vs Serbia and Montenegro for genocide? Please don't deny that Croats didn't suffer in the war like Serbs and Montenegrins. Also, do you know the most frequent explanation by the Croatian government for the six hundred thousand Serbs' exodus from Croatia from the other side (you gotta hear out both sides)> that Knin called the people to flee Croatia.

Didn't you ever hear of the Moldovan girl that was sold to Montenegro? Milo arrested numerous high-ranking officials, including the state prosecutor and then covered it up. As for other criminal actions - did you know there was a gand war in Montenegro headed by Milo and the Italian mafia? All these are sourced and well-supported facts (I will show you sources). There's an ongoing criminal investment against him in Italy. And un-arguably, Milo fought for a Greater Montenegro in the beginning 1990s. --PaxEquilibrium 01:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Human trafficking and cigarettes smuggling
The government of prime minister Milo Djukanovic came under severe pressure over cases of human trafficking and cigarette smuggling. The affairs led to criticism by the European Union, the United States, and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). One scandal involved a Moldovan woman who claimed to be sexually abused in a brothel by top officials. Several high-ranking officials were forced to resign, and the Interior Ministry admitted in November 2003 that Djukanovic himself was under investigation by Italian prosecutors over accusations of cigarette smuggling.

Taken from Montenegro - European Forum

There are numerous other examples. I remember Milo assassinating Dan's managing editor and that he prepared the assassination of the Serbian Republic's Premier in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Do you really support Milo and his DPS CG? --PaxEquilibrium 01:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I got the impression since you were (in a way) defending him.

There are a lot more options than just the two. Other than the DPS CG and SDP CG you have the SL (SNS, NSS, DSJ, SRS), SNP CG, PzP and LPCG. --PaxEquilibrium 12:18, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know, by the way, that the Podgorica Civic Assembly has proclaimed Stjepan Mesic honorary citizen? Relations between Montenegro and Croatia are improving. --PaxEquilibrium 12:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you have a bigger choice now - it's no longer dualism. If you don't like the ruling DPS-SDP-HGI nor SNP there are numerous other choices. --PaxEquilibrium 14:37, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Milant,[edit]

Where do you live, if I may know? --PaxEquilibrium 22:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Club 27[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Club 27, by CultureDrone (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Club 27 is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Club 27, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Club 27 itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:06, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

чланак Вељко Милковић[edit]

Видим да је енглески чланак у чијој дебати о останку си и ти учествовао је поново номинован за брисање из истих разлога [2]. Како ја видим ту је и српски чланак са свим неопходних референцама и независним изворима који потврдђују све наводе, те нема никаквог разлога да се брише. Ternit (talk) 02:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]