User talk:Mikey-is-lost

March 2008[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - April 2008[edit]

The above newsletter was delivered by an automatic bot because you are registered on the WikiProject Big Brother spamlist. Please feel free to remove yourself if you do not wish to receive these messages anymore.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 14:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Big Brother 9 (U.S.). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:17, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What incorrect information??? --Mikey-is-lost (talk) 23:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to The Apprentice (UK Series Four), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fritzpoll (talk) 12:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - May 2008[edit]

The above newsletter was delivered by an automatic bot because you are registered on the WikiProject Big Brother spamlist. Please feel free to remove yourself if you do not wish to receive these messages anymore.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 10:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Big Brother Australia 2008. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Big Brother Australia 2008 has not been canceled by Network Ten. The program is still running according to the network itself and the show website. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 01:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Big Brother Australia 2008 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Shapiros10 WuzHere 22:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Yoghurt. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — the Sidhekin (talk) 19:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.-Wafulz (talk) 17:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lost DVD releases, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Collectonian, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by making personal attacks. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. seresin ( ¡? ) 22:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikey-is-lost (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what did i do!!!!!?!?!?

Decline reason:

You have only just come off a previous block, and seem to not understand that your personal attack was totally uncalled for. — Kevin (talk) 22:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Looks like you've been trying to make some helpful edits; I do appreciate that. However, pagemove vandalism and personal attacks really aren't the way to get ahead in these parts. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bovlb (talk) 16:44, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Luma (band)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Luma (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 23:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Big Brother 2009 (UK). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 13:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jack McElhone ‎, you will be blocked from editing. Closedmouth (talk) 13:59, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Closedmouth. Barras || talk 14:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Closedmouth (talk) 14:07, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]