User talk:Michron777

Hello, Michron777, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 05:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

You are welcome! Happy editing Red Director (talk) 21:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Your Story Hour (April 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:NORG.

K.e.coffman (talk) 00:15, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Your Story Hour concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Your Story Hour, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Your Story Hour[edit]

Hello, Michron777. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Your Story Hour".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 19:30, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Teahouse post on Your Story Hour[edit]

Hello Michron777, I saw your Teahouse post, then looked at the Your Story Hour draft and I (a non-reviewer) believe that the radio series is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. I have never had a draft article rejected, so I'm not an expert on asking for a second reviewer to look at what I've written, but I urge you to do so.

As already stated, I'm no expert on this, but I went to the pink "Submission rejected" box on top of your draft, and then clicked on the little blue "Ask for advice" box (inside the pink box) to see how things are set up. After studying what is written it appears that you need to go down to what I call the White Writing Box, and find the sentence that begins "Below this line." Begin writing below that line and politely request that your article be reviewed a second time. State that you have recently added 9 newspaper article references which you feel help to establish that the radio series, which has been continuously broadcast for 70+ years, and is now heard on 4,000 radio stations, is notable. You may wish to add that if the draft article subject is still considered to be not notable you would appreciate advice on whether you can do more to show its notability. Review your post to make sure there are no errors in what you've just written, then scroll down to the very bottom and click on the blue "Publish changes" box.

I hope that you are able to have your well-written article published. Best wishes to you. Karenthewriter (talk) 00:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your response. It is very encouraging. I thought I requested it again. But I will word it the way you suggested. Thank you very much Michron777 (talk) 00:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Machron777, you may have requested it again, but I couldn't see it when I looked. Perhaps an earlier request isn't seen when another person looks at the page. Karenthewriter (talk) 02:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michron777 because I had messaged you earlier I received notice of the unfortunate decision by a reviewer. I am sorry for the outcome, which seems to be final. Perhaps, sometime in the future, you will be able to find another venue -- such as a specialized website or a blog site -- to preserve the history of Your Story Hour, but for now it will likely be best to set aside the project and work on other interests until the sting of the rejection is not so fresh. Best wishes to you. Karenthewriter (talk) 21:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Karenthewriter Thank you. Yeah I was disappointed. Notability and Advertisement seems to be the problem now. But perhaps what you suggest is what has to be done for now. I will leave it alone again and just save the info I've worked on. Thank you very much for your assistance. I really appreciate it. Michron777 (talk) 15:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Your Story Hour has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Your Story Hour. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Your Story Hour[edit]

Hi Michron777, I'm 78.26, and I have some experience here. I am quite familiar with "Your Story Hour" (grew up listening to it on the radio and on records). It's undoubtable notable, but honestly most of the prose needs to be re-written. The "adversiting/promotional" problems come from statements like "of Christian denominations in many countries, have benefited from these". Why is it an encyclopedia's place to say people have benefited from the program? How do you define "benefited" and maintain a WP:NPOV, one of our core policies? Anyway, I'm willing to help you with it, if you want. Try to gather as much information as you can from reliable, WP:INDEPENDENT sources. You must present the topic from an objective, dispassionate perspective, the way someone with no connection to the program, or even Christianity, might present it. As a first suggestion, perhaps some information can be found at the Adventist Archives. (https://www.adventistarchives.org/) You'll need to be careful about what information you use, but factual information could probably be found there, beware opinions. I hope that is of some help. 03:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC) 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 03:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that. That is helpful. But I do hope that would be the only thing. I try to not make it sound promotional or proselytizing. Some pages have only one source reference and they are published. And others have the same word choices I used and they are published. So it's quite confusing because both are stated reasons why it keeps being denied Michron777 (talk) 17:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]