User talk:Michael7604/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
The article Microsoft Musical Instruments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of any notability found.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 07:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Matchbox: Emergency Patrol moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Matchbox: Emergency Patrol, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
The article Tonka Construction 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article on a video game is unsourced, no reviews could be found on a search and nothing is listed on Metacritic.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
The article Tonka Construction 2 has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
"WikiProject Chemistry" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect WikiProject Chemistry and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 26#WikiProject Chemistry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:51, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Emporium Pies for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emporium Pies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
MB 03:40, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
hi
hello Kenny 1111 (talk) 14:55, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Michael7604. Thank you for creating Thunderbolt (siren). User:Trainsandotherthings, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
This siren appears notable, but the article needs more citations. I've found sources at https://www.ksn.com/weather/weather-stories/storm-track-3-historical-tornado-siren-significance-marking-70-years/ and https://www.mprnews.org/story/2010/08/17/tornado-sirens - I'm going to mark this as reviewed since it clears GNG and I don't see any major policy issues
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Trainsandotherthings}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Matchbox: Emergency Patrol
Hello, Michael7604. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Matchbox: Emergency Patrol, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Matchbox: Emergency Patrol
Hello, Michael7604. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Matchbox: Emergency Patrol".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 09:56, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited C15H14O, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diphenylacetone. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Pierce County substation attack for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierce County substation attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bromotoluene has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
UtherSRG (talk) 19:39, 19 January 2023 (UTC)AfC vs non-AfC draft space work
While I appreciate the desire to use the draft space to initially create articles, if you don't want to go through the AfC process, then don't put the AfC tags on the draft. :) And definitely don't then submit it for review. :D Anyway, since you did do all of that, it was easier for me to use the AFCH tool to do the move after manually deleting the redirect that was in the way, instead if the manual move I would have had to do from RM/TR... and then the cleanup of the AFC tags and such... Anyway, good job on the article. I updated the benzyl bromide article to have a similar "distinguish" tag on it. UtherSRG (talk) 19:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Michael7604. Thank you for your work on 2,5-Bis(4-bromophenyl)-3,4-diphenylcyclopentadienone. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article! Hopefully you will write and create more article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Michael7604. Thank you for your work on 4-Iodobenzoic acid. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article! Hopefully you will create more in the future! Have a good day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Inquiry
Is there a reason you're creating a bunch of blank talk pages? I'm not saying it's harmful, but it is rather pointless. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 01:18, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Michael7604. Thank you for your work on 2024 Texas elections. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Reference URLs
Obviously I love science content with cited refs. But please do not include |url= fields for doi.org. The |doi= field already creates that link in a more standard way and the template sometimes has a different default link for the article-title. DMacks (talk) 23:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Template:Year in 'country' change
Hello Michael7604, I hope you're doing well 🙂 I recently reverted two edits you made to the Template:Year in the United States. All of these templates should have a pretty standard formatting: being a link to the country's history first, a timeline of their history (if available) second, and finally a list of years of that country. For clarity sake, I tend to not shorten these links so its clear what they link to, but I am willing to discuss that with you. Also, as far as I'm aware, no 'year' in United States politics and government article exists, and I really don't think one should, because if a government policy isn't notable enough to make it onto the main 'year' in the United States article, it probably shouldn't have it's own wiki page. I do want to give credit where it is due though, and thank you for making that great looking year in U.S. territories template, and putting it on every year in the United States page- it looks great! Sorry for the long message, I couldn't think of a way to shorten it, cheers! Johnson524 13:53, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Decades in the United States
Template:Decades in the United States has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:38, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Decade in region templates
A tag has been placed on Category:Decade in region templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for working on diffusing Category:Name reactions! This subcategory is obvious one that is viable from lit sources, not just WP editors' concepts. But the major refs I find, such as doi:10.1002/9780470638859 and doi:10.1016/C2021-0-02076-9, all seem to use the phrase organic name reaction not name organic reaction. Any objection to renaming the subcat to Category:Organic name reactions? DMacks (talk) 19:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- I think that's a good idea, same for Category:Name inorganic reactions to Category:Inorganic name reactions. and while we are on renaming categories, Category:Chemical reactions of ethers should be shortened to Category:Reactions of ethers Michael7604 (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
I can handle the name-reaction renames easily enough.Good idea to CFD the ethers (Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 13#Category:Chemical reactions of ethers) as a good test case of a potentially large set. DMacks (talk) 20:12, 21 January 2024 (UTC)- Looks like we're supposed to go through CFD (not speedy) for those others also. I'll file them momentarily... DMacks (talk) 20:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_21#Category:Name_organic_reactions. DMacks (talk) 20:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like we're supposed to go through CFD (not speedy) for those others also. I'll file them momentarily... DMacks (talk) 20:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Aryl
You might ask around, but in my world, pyridyl is not an aryl. IUPAC implies as much. March, which is the bible for most of us, repeatedly refers to aryl, but invariably as a derivative of phenyl. I'm guessing that most organic chemists would object to pyridyl being aryl. Org. Syn, an open-source series overseen by the organic cognoscenti, refers to aryl >500x. A quick spot check of Org Syn again indicates that aryl is used exclusively as phenyl derivatives. --Smokefoot (talk) 13:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- If you scroll down through this long article in OS, there is an example where a high powered organic chemist distinguishes aryl vs heteroaryl (i.e. pyridyl etc). http://www.orgsyn.org/demo.aspx?prep=v98p0068. You might consider creating a subsection in aryl group on "heteroaryl".--Smokefoot (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)