User talk:Meeples/Archive 1

User Subspace Navigation

Home

◘

◘

◘

◘

◘

Talk Archives
1 — 2 — 3

ARCHIVES 1 -- AUG 2006

This page is intended for archive purposes only. DO NOT EDIT ANYTHING ON THIS PAGE! All edits will be reverted, and any comments placed here will be ignored.

If you want to leave a comment, please start a new section at the bottom of my active talk page.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Meeples, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -Phoenixrod 02:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental Warning[edit]

Sorry, didn't mean to warn you. Vandalproof isn't terribly picky on who it decides to revert. Corrected, and fixed. Galactor213 04:05, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: FahrenHYPE 9/11; Sidney Franklin; Terri Clark; Francisco Mancebo; Lonnie Mack; Jason Griffith; Jason Anthony Griffith; Terry Glenn; Holyoke Community College; Malaspina University-College; Lani Minella; Hasenpfeffer; Klaptrap; Rayman Arena; Cardinal Spellman High School (Brockton, Massachusetts); St. John Bosco High School; Phonak (cycling team); Kanji Ishiwara; The Heights School

Cleanup: Guardian Unit of Nations; Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog); Stamford High School
Merge: King Boom Boo; Hypernova; Eggrobo
Add Sources: Hagwon; List of the most popular names in the 1910s in the United States; Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (video game)
Wikify: David L. Smith; Matt Stifler; MIT Enterprise Forum
Expand: Ride wit Me; Unreal Championship; Gunsmith Cats

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof![edit]

Hi, Meeples/Archive 1, thank you for applying for VandalProof. I am happy to announce that you are now authorized for use, so if you haven't already, simply download VandalProof from our main page and install it, and you're all set!

If you have any queries, please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Welcome to our team! - Glen 08:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I Walk the Line article[edit]

what up man, please dont censor the painful message in the song just because it relates to the sensitive subject of drug abuse. this is considered vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by EvaBallering (talk • contribs) 6:58, 9 August, 2006 (UTC).

I have responded to this on your talk page. ~~ Meeples 07:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MEDIEVAL MUSIC SUCKS BALLS[edit]

8=====>

Gee, I wish it worked that way. Thanks for your constructive comments, though. ~~ Meeples 23:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spammer[edit]

I've temporarily blocked 72.68.208.68, who you reported. Have you rolled back all of the spam? — ERcheck (talk) 00:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, all should be reverted. ~~ Meeples 01:15, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Your work is appreciated! — ERcheck (talk) 01:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Political interps of the Wizard of Oz[edit]

I edit from the address of 69.221.94.250, at least for now, and forgot to log in. In any case, it was on Studio 360 last week; perhaps it was the wrong place for the information, but it's true. Whether or not the queer theorists' opinions are correct is entirely up to the reader. Lockesdonkey 03:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry -- that kind of thing looks like vandalism, and since you didn't cite your source (and it came from an IP address), I just assumed it was in fact vandalism. It would help if you did cite the source. You might also consider just adding it to the talk page, though I think citing the source would make it work fine, though it's up to you. Hope this helps. Sorry for that! ~~ Meeples 03:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Welcome to the project! Regarding your user name, are you Carcassonne fan? Ziggurat 04:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually not; it's just a name I've used for various things over the years. By the way, I see you uploaded a picture of the Ear of Dionysius. I spent part of last summer in Siracusa -- fantastic place. ~~ Meeples 04:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, quite the coincidence then. I was wandered around Sicily about three years ago now, and Siracusa was probably my favourite town - such a friendly place! Ziggurat 05:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you erase my article?[edit]

Kevin Weisman is the illegitamite, bastard love child of Quentin Tarantino, and Joaquin Phoenix, ya fucking dickweed!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.163.100.139 (talk • contribs)

I'll keep that in mind. ~~ Meeples 05:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MEChA[edit]

Instead of the sources tag, just revert the edit. I am positive that parts of that come from a mecha website (I just went to confirm). The part here titled "philosophy" is the same as the philosophy section this user is putting in (at least the first sentence is). It violates neutrality and probably also copywrite policies. I've left two messages for this user but they don't seem to be responding and are continuing to make these edits. Ungovernable Force^{The Wiki Kitchen!} 05:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Thanks. ~~ Meeples 05:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?[edit]

Hello there...

I am very confused by your recent message to me about vandlism in regards to ChristianEdwardGruber's user page. What I did was not vandalism as you can see by the edit summery. I was switching out an old userbox for a new one, and I have done so before for Christian before now. Will you please let me know why you feel what I did was vandalism, this is the first time since I have started the userbox change over that I have ever been accused of this, and it has come as a shock to me. - LA @ 07:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was a mistake on my part -- should be fixed already. ~~ Meeples 07:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert to July[edit]

I received a message advising me of vandalism originating from my IP address. I apologize for what may have appeared to be such. It was actually my teenage son demonstrating to me the VandalProof feature of WikiPedia. It won't happen again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.225.21 (talk • contribs)

No problem. Just be careful in the future and there won't be an issue. ~~ Meeples 20:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Roeper[edit]

Roeper has stated (and so has Ebert) that Ferris Bueller's Day Off is one of Roeper's favorite films. I watch Ebert and Roeper every week so I know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.63.39 (talk • contribs)

I've responded to this on your talk page. While I don't think it's an essential fact to add to the article, citing the source will help. ~~ Meeples 01:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I should have said this before. I do have a source of my claim about Bueller's Day Off. On the June 24, 2006 episode of Ebert & Roeper, Ebert said it was one of Roeper's favorite films. Here's the link if you don't believe me (click on audio for Wassup Rockers): http://tvplex.go.com/buenavista/ebertandroeper/060626.html Can I please put it up again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.63.39 (talk • contribs)

Yes, if you cite the source properly. See the article Wikipedia:Citing_sources for assistance. I cannot guarantee that someone else will not edit out your contribution, of course. ~~ Meeples 01:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...[edit]

Bitch I will fucking kill you and all of Wikipedia!!!! Stop being a little bitch about things. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigga360 (talk • contribs)

Umm... right. You know that it's difficult to "kill" inanimate objects such as an online encyclopedia, right? ~~ Meeples 06:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Jones (football player)[edit]

I deleted that section of the arcticle because that criticism has never been voiced, it looks like whoever wrote that is just somebody who is voicing their own criticism. If there is an article with this concern about his catching style it should be listed.--Hasty5o 05:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to find some information that supported the statement that he often catches passes with one hand. I do see your point -- it was a rather negatively worded paragraph. I've cleaned it up a little. Does that seem more reasonable? Let me know. ~~ Meeples 05:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did'nt have a huge problem with the wording it just seemed unfounded. If you could provide a link to the article criticising his catching style i think that would suffice.--Hasty5o 05:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[1] (it's a part of his AOL football profile; found here) ~~ Meeples 05:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems lagit now, thanks. Also did you revert it because i deleted the whole thing or because i wasn't signed on?--Hasty5o 06:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a combo -- I typically only look at anonymous IP edits, though that's not always the case. In the future, please include a reason for deleting material in the edit summary, and people like me are a lot less likely to revert it. By the way, I'll go remove the warning I gave you, since your edit was certainly in good faith. ~~ Meeples 06:07, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--Hasty5o 06:21, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Esperanza![edit]

Welcome, Meeples, to Esperanza! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.

Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is Stressbusters, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.

In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Proposals.

If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Natalya by email or talk page. Consider introducing yourself at the Esperanza talk page! Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, you may find help at an IRC tutorial. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!

Ungovernable Force^{The Wiki Kitchen!} 02:41, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Bush vandalism[edit]

Dear Meeples,

I'm the one who added the nonsense to Kate Bush. She, David Bowie, and Peter Gabriel are the only musical artists of which I am fans. I HAD NO IDEA THAT YOU COULD ACTUALLY EDIT ARTICLES!!!! I've every recording Kate has done. PLEASE, IF YOU'VE the ability restore the original article. Why does Wikipedia allow readers to edit articles? Any nut (which I am sure is what you think I am) can actually change these articles?? I am very sorry. I love Kate Bush and have done so ever since I saw her perform Them Heavy People on Saturday Night Live back in the mid-70s. Please forgive me; I've been drinking and didn't think that I was actually editing anything.

Sincerely, Bob S. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert30144 (talk • contribs)

No worries. All has been reverted. ~~ M e eples (talk)(email) 17:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1864[edit]

It wasn't nonsense; according to the Prophecy of Our Lady of LaSallette, Satan was released from Hell. Look it up if you want; even if you or anyone else doesn't believe in Satan it is still a historical fact that influenced a considerable amount of Catholics. If you are unable to look up the actual prophecy, I would be happy to provide it for you. Wikipedia includes such "nonsense" as when Dr. Light from Mega Man won the Nobel Prize, and yet an important element of Catholic history which affected millions is not worth posting? That's absurd, if you ask me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.111.157.136 (talk • contribs)

It seems like vandalism, so pardon me if I'm wrong. If you can provide proper sources, then it seems like a valid statement to include. I personally disagree about your view of what's "an important element of Catholic history" -- I have a suspicion that most mainstream Cathlolics would disagree with that -- but, again, if you have sources in which to prove me wrong, please cite them here. Sorry for the inconvenience. ~~ M e eples (talk)(email) 05:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quick follow-up -- since I haven't gotten a response, and the article 1864 remains unchanged since I reverted it, I'm sticking with my initial decision. ~~ M e eples (talk)(email) 02:53, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

change to McDonald's[edit]

sry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.235.41.233 (talk • contribs)

No prob. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. ~~ M e eples (talk)(email) 06:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Capon Edit[edit]

This was valid. It tells the story of where the origanil term came from, please change it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.101.99.83 (talk • contribs)

The story seems to be nonsensical -- nothing to do at all with the actual topic. If I'm somehow wrong, please cite the source here, and then you can add it back to the article. However, without citing the source, adding that story back in to the article will likely be considered vandalism. ~~ M e eples (talk)(email) 06:52, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of College and University links[edit]

I am referring to your spamming message. Please note that links have not been added but just formatted from italics to normal font as per the Wikipedia guidelines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.158.39.217 (talk • contribs)

I see that now. Links still seem like spam, even if you aren't the source tonight. ~~ M e eples (talk)(email) 07:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links have been scrutinated months ago and, where considered useful, left there by each state editor according to the wikipedia guidelines.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.158.39.217 (talk • contribs)

I won't touch these any more. ~~ M e eples (talk)(email) 07:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. Please advise whether I can still format from italics to normal the font of the links and sort them by alphabetical order in accordance with the Wikipedia guidelines.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.158.39.217 (talk • contribs)

What you're doing is not wrong at all - you're just cleaning up what was already there (and I've slowed you down by incorrectly assuming you were spamming). To be honest, I cannot say whether the links should stay -- I'm inclined to call them spam, but I think that should be decided by someone else. Perhaps someone with more experience on the topic than I will be able to help out. ~~ M e eples (talk)(email) 07:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I leave them like that then. Thank you for the suggestions.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.158.39.217 (talk • contribs)

If you do believe the link follows Wikipedia policies, then you can replace the ones I removed -- if anyone asks, send them to this page (or perhaps my talk page archives if it's not within the next few days) -- I will keep this conversation, so I can be held accountable if I'm wrong. ~~ M e eples (talk)(email) 07:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? (Re: Vandalism to Joseph Blanchette)[edit]

What do you mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.31.63.69 (talk • contribs)

You replaced random words with other random and somewhat questionable or offensive words and phrases. That's vandalism; please stop. ~~ M e eples (talk)(email) 00:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Monacan High School Edit[edit]

Actually, Monacan High School has a very strong reputation for being a "pothead school." I live very close to the school and know people who attend it, so i know what i'm talking about.

71.206.133.7 03:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cite the source and it'll be fine. Sorry for the confusion -- I'll remove the warning. ~~ M e eples (talk)(email) 03:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alleged Vandalism[edit]

Meeples, It has been a long time since I accesed this web site. To my surprise, I received several emails warning me (three times) about an alleged vandalism. I have no idea what are you talking about since I have never added any terms to any of your dictionaries/lists. Please check your sources before you send something this negative to someone. As a professional, I would not do anything that childish. So, please retract your emails for everyone to see. I don't want any of my colleagues to get the wrong impression about me.

Sincerely, 64.12.116.139 15:17, 24 August 2006 (UTC)Silvia Lee 64.12.116.139 15:17, 24 August 2006 (UTC)Certified Professional Interpreter/Translator[reply]

Hi -- It appears, from the IP address you used to sign this page, that you are using AOL. That means that your IP address changes with each connection to AOL. Warnings intended for a vandal can then be forwarded to the wrong person. I noticed that the IP address you used to sign this comment did not include any warnings posted by me -- your IP address has since changed from when you received the warnings. Unless you can prove otherwise, I'm sure the warnings were legitimate, and also not intended for you personally. I recommend registering for an account here, which prevents any mixups with AOL accounts. Also, warnings would not be sent by email, so I'm rather confused about that part -- exactly what do you mean by that?

Because your AOL connection means that the IP address you left in your comment probably will not allow me to get back to you, I won't post any of this on the talk page of the IP address given. If you have any other questions or concerns, please let me know. Hope this clears things up. ~~ M e eples (talk)(email) 02:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]