User talk:MariAna Mimi
Welcome!
Hello, MariAna Mimi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Renrenren (talk) 01:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| Awarded for your great work improving the format of references in Wikipedia articles - I think properly formatted references are essential -- Boing! said Zebedee 21:31, 23 March 2010 (UTC) |
As u were helpful in adding to the Rated R (Rihanna album) article's genre issue, would u mind adding to this discussion over the album's genre(s)? Dan56 (talk) 22:45, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
This album is not really most of those genres. Some of its songs seem to contain musical elements of rock and funk, which it samples/interpolates. But soul is rooted in gospel-style vocals and sound, and there are only two tracks that feature rapping (by guest artists). R&B would already cover the hip hop-influence of the album's sound/production/beats, as the genre incorporates elements of hip hop and soul. I just thought an album that has the majority of tracks R&B in sound and vocal-style, w/some tracks that contain only elements of other genre(s), should be labeled as R&B in the infobox. The issue with what musical elements over genre has been brought up in a lot of the articles Ive edited. Dan56 (talk) 07:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
twitter[edit]
I see you reverted my edit, I have opened a discussion on the talkpage, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 17:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Just to let you know I have opened a discussion thread at the RSN board here , Off2riorob (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
The Greatest Hits 2002 (Anastacia)[edit]
Do you think The Greatest Hits 2002 (Anastacia) is a hoax?—Kww(talk) 00:14, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Most definitely a hoax. It's probably just some obscure bootleg. I have nominated it for deletion. Imperatore (talk) 00:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes! of course it's a hoax! she has only released 1 greatest hits album. MariAna_MiMi (Talk) 12:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Not Myself Tonight[edit]
Please do not delete the paragraph in the lead. The lead should be a summary of what is in the article, and there for music, a summary of reception, music video, etc. See WP:LEAD for more. Candyo32 (talk) 11:28, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Album article/user[edit]
A user on the Raymond v. Raymond article has been vandalizing the page, removing and replacing sourced material. Some of the chart info the user added is legit, but most of it is unstable/unarchived and is of no use to the statements he/she's trying to support. I have discussed his issues on the article's talk page but I think I am dealing with some fan of the album. (Article's history of the edits can be of use aswell) I dont want to cross the line with reverting anymore so I would appreciate your help with this matter. Dan56 (talk) 20:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
"Cover"[edit]
See cover version. A "cover" doesn't mean that someone provided a jacket illustration, it means that another group has released a version of the same song. It is nearly impossible for a future single to pass WP:NSONGS.—Kww(talk) 17:27, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Bionic Tracklist[edit]
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/news/a221899/aguilera-reveals-bionic-production-credits.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xandgood (talk • contribs) 15:55, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Kylie Minogue:Rare and Unreleased[edit]
You'll have to nominate it for AFD or put a {{prod}} tag on it. I'd try the prod first. I agree it should be deleted, but it doesn't meet any of the speedy categories so I can't just do it on my own.—Kww(talk) 21:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Mariah Carey[edit]
Hello MariAna, I would appreciate if you could imput your opinion here. It would greatly assist reaching a consensus.--PeterGriffin • Talk 05:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm also a kylie minogue fan![edit]
hello there! my name is renato miguel and im 13 years old, im from portugal and im also a kylie minogue fan! As you might know, i translated information from "aphrdoite"'s spanish wiki page and you removed it. I was wondering if you please could revert the edit and please resource it because this page would have more infromation with that. thank u, Salgado96. PS: we have the same idols! Just a question are u portugese? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Salgado96 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
tabloid review[edit]
I am trying to reach a consensus on my edits for the No Line on the Horizon article relating to reviews: about two reviews being replaced b/c of notability/professional-ism?, and a tabloid publication Herald Sun being used as a review in the rev-template and critical response section. Would u like to comment here? Dan56 (talk) 21:59, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Do ya need glasses?[edit]i am getting tired of your edits, i reverted the edit which you call a "good version" and i removed that thing a bout THE SUN and you said the same... thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Salgado96 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC) Please stop deleting![edit]
Reverting[edit]
Mariah Carey Discussion[edit]Hi Mariana, I would appreciate you input here, so we can finally reach a consensus. Thanks :).--PeterGriffin • Talk 01:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC) Reality Killed The Video Star (again)[edit]
Stars Stars Stars=)[edit]
Hello[edit]Could u please help me to make peer review for article FK Qarabağ? I really appreciate your help--NovaSkola (talk) 15:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC) Fan editor[edit]I've been having a problem with an editor whose been making slanted edits to the article Raymond v. Raymond, an fan (self-professed). The editor has accused me of vandalizing for removing her slightly bloated additions to the article's reception section. As I dont want the problem to go any further than our recent comments to each other, I'm asking will you help with the matter? Dan56 (talk) 22:43, 5 September 2010 (UTC) I Hate Boys[edit]Actually Australia's equivalent of Media Base reported the song was made available to AUS radio where it became the second most added song. Additionally its on AUS and NZ iTunes as a single with its own b-side and a cover-art. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 18:05, 11 September 2010 (UTC) Removal of succession boxes[edit]Hi, there is a discussion at WT:CHARTS to remove succession boxes from articles for songs and albums that reached number one. They are redundant to the charts section because it already lists the charts at which it went to number one. General opinion is leaning towards their removal but everyone's feedback is welcome so a consensus can be reached. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 22:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)  You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Removal of Contributed Information.[edit]Hello MariaAna Mimi. I made 2 minor additions to the track listing of CD3 of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_and_Out_of_Consciousness:_Greatest_Hits_1990–2010 noting that the last 2 tracks are only available as a Digital Download, the tracks do not appear on the physical CD. This was to clarify for anyone who may wish to have all the tracks and orders the Deluxe Boxset only to discover that the last two tracks are missing. So, my question to you is - why did you remove this information that I contributed? The source of the track listing is Amazon.com mp3 download version, not the physical CD/DVD media edition. Cheers, Absamdb Absamdb (talk) 11:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Absamdb (talk • contribs) 06:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC) Hi MariAna, there are just a couple of outstanding issues with the article. Could you have a look at them so I can get the GA closed in the next few days? Cavie78 (talk) 17:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello again, are you able to address the few remaining minor concerns? It's now over a week since I messaged you. Cavie78 (talk) 15:38, 11 November 2010 (UTC) Here Come the Girls Tour[edit]Hi there! Here Come the Girls is a tour by three singers so, as this is the Wikipedia, it's useful to know which were singer solos, so I don't think you should remove that part from that page. Besides that you changed "Ladies GaGa" to "Lady GaGa", but let me tell you, "Ladies GaGa" it's not the name of the singer but the name of the medley itself which contains Lady GaGa's hits. Thanks for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkfreakxx7 (talk • contribs) 10:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC) Keri Hilson[edit]Hi there, I've noticed you've edited Keri Hilson's debut album article before. Feel free to edit and help out on her second album's article, No Boys Allowed. ozurbanmusic (talk) 06:38, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Bionic, Aguilera issue[edit]Since you've made recent contributions to this article, would you like to comment on an issue brought up recently? Dan56 (talk) 01:55, 26 March 2011 (UTC) Aphrodite World Tour[edit]Your edits to the Aphrodite World Tour article have been reverted on the basis of original research and neutrality. Wikipedia clearly states you must use sources beyond the primary source. You constantly refer to Kylie Minogue's website as your primary source stating "it's official", when it is not. Minogue's website it not firsthand news and will not be treated as such. Even though it may say one thing on Minogue's website, there are a variety of sources that will contradict that information (as far as locations), thus the majority should be acknowledged and not the minority. Furthermore, you constantly add the fan Facebook page for the tour, knowing Wikipedia does not allow information from blogs, fan sites or message boards to be used. Once again, this is not an official Facebook page and you will need to find reliable evidence if you want to prove it is official. Itsbydesign (talk) 10:25, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing.Itsbydesign (talk)
Hi Mariana, would you like to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Mariah Carey? :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 06:58, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Speak Now discussion[edit]Would you like to add your thoughts to a discussion regarding cited material and synthesis for the article Speak Now? There have been numerous reverts and revision recently. Dan56 (talk) 17:22, 20 July 2011 (UTC) July 2011[edit] In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mari you should know better. I know your intentions are good but we have protocol and as far as I can see you have made no effort to warn him/her on his talkpage. I've done this for you and have no choice but to warn you too. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 20:15, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
You may wish to:[edit]see here — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 00:25, 25 July 2011 (UTC) Bionic leak[edit]Why do you undo my revision? -Syukri Abd Rahman (talk) 11:54, 30 October 2011 (UTC) Hi MariAna Mimi! I've reverted your addition to Charmbracelet. If you disagree with my edit, feel free to discuss the issue out. Thank you for your contributions.--Novice7 (talk) 10:48, 15 November 2011 (UTC) Take Care talk page[edit]Would you mind adding your two cents to Talk:Take_Care#Downtempo? User:Journalist is going off on removing a genre that is sourced, claiming it is not a genre, offering no support of his assertion, giving me the ultimatum when he's the one making a controversial removal, and putting the burden on me. Dan56 (talk) 05:52, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Sources[edit]i saw you have wrote here. Can you give me some valid sources about this page? Please answer to me in it.wiki, i don't use this wiki and i have a bad memory for retorn here and read :D Sorry for the mistakes--AccendiLaLuce (talk) 02:38, 26 March 2012 (UTC) One Direction discography[edit]Could you please fill in reflinks on One Direction discography page i don't know how AdabowtheSecond (talk) 20:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC) Thanks[edit]April 2012[edit]First Warning[edit]
Second Warning[edit]
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Itsbydesign (talk) 02:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC) Third Warning[edit]
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Itsbydesign (talk) 23:25, 28 May 2012 (UTC) Final Warning[edit]
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Itsbydesign (talk) 23:40, 1 July 2012 (UTC) Metacritic links[edit]I noticed that you've been adding Metacritic links to WP:ALBUMS articles. Normally, links used as sources in the article shouldnt be included in the external links section (WP:ELPOINTS). Dan56 (talk) 17:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 11[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Take the Crown Stadium Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 11 July 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 23[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Take the Crown Stadium Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 23 July 2013 (UTC) Beyoncé (album)[edit]Hey! Thank you for adding The A.V. Club review to the Beyoncé (album) page. I'm just dropping you a note to let you know that when citing sources you must do so fully. As in, you simply can't just use the bare URL, e.g. <ref>www.avclub.com/review/beyonces-surprise-album-is-her-most-substantial-an-200652</ref>. Have a read over WP:CITE to see how you can do this easily with the "Template" drop-down bar. Cheers! —JennKR | ☎ 22:17, 16 December 2013 (UTC) Kiss Me Once[edit]Why is it you are so against merging Singles into Promotion? Your edits are clearly showing signs of owning an article, which is against Wikipedia policy; some articles list singles separately and some merge them. So I'd like to know why you feel it should be separate. I feel it's too early for such a small section and we should wait until further singles are released. livelikemusic my talk page! 00:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 21[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kiss Me Once, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 21 March 2014 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Craig David Greatest Hits.jpg[edit] Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Cryptic 22:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Nerina Pallot The Graduate 2009.jpg[edit]Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 03:52, 30 July 2015 (UTC) Hi, Orphaned non-free image File:RW In and Out of Consciousness 2010.jpg[edit]Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 7 December 2015 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit] Hello, MariAna Mimi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) References formatting[edit] I made an image guide on how to do this, and it's really easy. Thanks. Destiny Leo (talk) 11:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]Hello, MariAna Mimi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Weddings, Barmitzvahs & Stadiums Tour[edit]
A tag has been placed on Weddings, Barmitzvahs & Stadiums Tour requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. » Shadowowl | talk 22:20, 12 July 2018 (UTC) |
