User talk:Manukpamuk

September 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Malatya Province, you may be blocked from editing. Semsûrî (talk) 17:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made proper explanation. Do you have any evidence there is a Malatya Province and Malatya is the capital. I do not like politic motivations on information sources. I will complain about you because I noticed you created a lot of duplicate uncredit pages showing every city province and removing all back history of these cities and setting as new Kurdish provience. Do not forget there are a lot of people passed from these lands.. Lands own people not the people and Do not erase the story of people in this lands... Manukpamuk (talk) 10:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Malatya. Uness232 (talk) 10:37, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are referencing another wiki page which is also not true.. I also complained Wikipedia officially. Please check the link you are putting what says about Malatya Provience. And show me any record capital of Malatya Provience is Malatya city.. Any... All Armenian, Roman, Byzantium history is removed from the Malatya Provience Section and here is what it says about provience the page you reference:The province was the regional center of Kurdish nationalism in the early 20th century. The local governor of the province and mayor of Malatya city were both sympathetic to the Kurdish cause and Celadet Bedir Khan, Kamuran Alî Bedirxan and other members of the Society for the Rise of Kurdistan visited the region various times and established cordial relations with the local tribes including with the Reşwan tribe.[12]

A tribe landowner group of Kurdish people (Not elected Kurdish people in Turkish parlement or in the city) ruling the Provience. Could you please provide offical document for it, it is feodalism which is not existing in Turkey.

Manukpamuk (talk) 11:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Malatya) for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 17:40, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manukpamuk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made all edits depending on hard proof and asked valid questions about the content did not get any answer but they reverted. The content of the Malatya Provience is created political motivations and here is my case. None of the record in history and now existing Malatya a Provience and capital is Malatya city. All Armenian, Roman, Byzantium history is removed from the Malatya Provience Section and here is what it says about provience page about history:The province was the regional center of Kurdish nationalism in the early 20th century. The local governor of the province and mayor of Malatya city were both sympathetic to the Kurdish cause and Celadet Bedir Khan, Kamuran Alî Bedirxan and other members of the Society for the Rise of Kurdistan visited the region various times and established cordial relations with the local tribes including with the Reşwan tribe.[12] The content is not history and unconfirmed politic act. All history of previous civilization are removed.Also referenced document is Encyclopedia of Islam which is controversial.I noticed that the user editor Semsuri created a lot of political page like this. Wikipedia is an information platform even we do not like the truth we should stick it not use the platform for political propaganda and ideas. Please check the contents and you will immediately see I am right and I should be unblocked. Thanks. Manukpamuk (talk) 18:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fixed unblock request formatting. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 20:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are missing the point completely. You were edit warring, and edit warring isn't OK even if you are right. Your arguments, edit summaries, and talk page posts are also hampered by a lack of grammatical correctness, which is not helped by what seems to be anger. Wikipedia is best edited by cool heads. Drmies (talk) 20:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]