User talk:Manish9893
Manish9893, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Manish9893! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC) |
Important Notice[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 13:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Fix infobox image syntax[edit]
Please stop changing the image syntax in Parliament of India. The field for |structure1= only accepts a plain filename. Otherwise, the article is placed in Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images to alert editors that it needs to be fixed. I have fixed it twice and you keep re-introducing the error. MB 16:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
I did upload a new file, forgot the field style. Manish9893 (talk) 16:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 8[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of current members of the Rajya Sabha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
1 Member of JKPDP has been expelled and now is an independent. Manish9893 (talk) 09:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 07:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- I just changed the grammar which as very hateful aginst us. Manish9893 (talk) 13:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- If you want to argue about "us" and "them", you better stick to Facebook and Twitter. Wikipedia is not for you. Wikipedia summarises reliable sources. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I Indian Map : Where do we create map which has bifurcated Jammu Kashmir and shows pok too ? Kindly tell. Manish9893 (talk) 13:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. Please stop making edits like this one. Wikipedia has no centralized system of creating maps and figures, and in any case that would not be the way to ask how to find it; edits like that are a nuisance, nothing more. If you would like to make maps yourself, the WP:TEAHOUSE might be the best place to ask for help; Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics might be another place where you may find people willing to help you. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Good Manish9893 (talk) 18:15, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Your map is not as good as the one the article already has[edit]
- Countries of all sizes have to be colored by size.
- French Guiana is part of France and must be colored the same as European France.
Georgia guy (talk) 11:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Sorry.... Denmark with green land too. Coloring tiniest countries is hard. It's rather an overview. Manish9893 (talk) 13:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Useless edits[edit]
This is the fourth or fifth time that I am seeing you delete content and then reinstate it. Can you explain why you do this? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I did not delete it...I rather posted it above....since it is in difference section the section can be trasfered only by deleting at one place and post at another.
This happened on Bharatiya Janata party page ...State results section. This caused inconvenience but the state results and ruling map and details should be along with loksabha amd rajyasabha results not after idiology section in my opinion. Manish9893 (talk) 09:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for explaining. If you edit the whole page, you can move content from one section to another in a single edit. Please make sure to write an edit summary as well stating that you are moving content to a different section. -- Kautilya3 (talk)
For sure i knew that but during the task i went for it as the edit was to be done alongwith transfer....(As you can see below States map, March 2020 was written it changed to Feb-2021 simultaneously. Manish9893 (talk) 15:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bharatiya Janata Party. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 20:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
BJP is basically a hindutva party. The flag which was being used have 40% green part 60% saffron part. This is not the case . It is low. So the flag by me was realistic not the other one. Ratio is 20-80. Manish9893 (talk) 04:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Regarding next delimitation of constituencies in India[edit]
Please see [1]. Relevant quote from there : "... the Constitution of India was specifically amended in 2002 not to have delimitation of constituencies till the first census after 2026. Thus, the present Constituencies carved out on the basis of 2001 census shall continue to be in operation till the first census after 2026." The first census after 2026 is probably going to be the one in 2031. Please review the above and make changes to the article. Also, do you have a good source for the expected number of LS seats to be 888? If so, please add it to the article. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:07, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
1st....right 2nd - Since the house is being made if 888 seats and 1 MP 1 Million rule is going to be applied (not statewise), by 2031 We will have almost 900 Million Voters so 888 anouncement meets perfect. Manish9893 (talk) 23:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Do you have an official source either for the 888 expected number OR for the "1 MP per million voters" rule that you mentioned? If so, please add it to the article's talk page MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021[edit]
Hello, I'm Nitesh003. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Next Indian general election, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Nitesh003 (talk) 08:12, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Next Indian general election, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Nitesh003 (talk) 08:12, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
I could not find shashitharoor pic....he jas more chance than sachin pilot Manish9893 (talk) 17:45, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021[edit]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2022 Indian presidential election. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Nitesh003 (talk) 09:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Kongu Nadu, you may be blocked from editing. SUN EYE 1 07:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Discretionary Sanctions Notice[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
SUN EYE 1 07:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
New message from TrangaBellam[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement § Manish9893. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction[edit]
The following sanction now applies to you:
You have been indefinitely topic banned from all pages and discussions concerning India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed. Please read WP:TBAN to see what "topic banned" means.
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Johnuniq (talk) 09:07, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
On what changes i am being banned...Refer to that page Manish9893 (talk) 09:10, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- This is the English Wikipedia and contributors need to be able to communicate effectively in English. The message above uses formal wording and might take some time to interpret but it should be understandable. See the link following "for the reasons" and read the comments there. Johnuniq (talk) 09:20, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- Johnuniq Manish9893 just violated their topic ban from India by editing this India related article here. Ratnahastin tålk 09:08, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
It is My Parliament and I know the real Area of that too.
It is 5.66 Acres, 22900 Sqr Mtr, Only if you can calculate it. Manish9893 (talk) 09:14, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Manish9893 Bans apply to all editing good or bad. I recommend that you self revert now or else you may get blocked,thanks.Ratnahastin tålk 09:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
@Manish9893: I know that Wikipedia's procedures are mysterious but the situation is that a topic ban applies to you, as described above. You will be blocked if there is another breach of that ban. While editing topics outside the ban, please bear in mind that all information added to an article must be verifiable. That means your opinion on the area of a parliament is not relevant (what if someone else had a different opinion?). A reliable source must be provided. Johnuniq (talk) 10:30, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. Johnuniq (talk) 22:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
It waa not a topic of social norms but area which can't be either 13 acre and at the same time 5.7 acre.
Google earth mapping shows it equal to old building which is less than 6 acres.
Measurement apps also shows it less than 6 acres.
And lastly
Bimal patel (Architect) shows it less than 1 acre.
Thank you. Manish9893 (talk) 05:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
West Bengal defections[edit]
Hi Manish, I noticed you recently edited West Bengal Legislative assembly to remove the TMC turncoats from the totals. The BJP MLAs who have joined the TMC in West Bengal should be shown as TMC MLAs unless they are disqualified by the Speaker for switching parties, which is unlikely. YttriumShrew (talk) 20:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
You have little knowledge of that
They have unofficially joined tmc and this is the point for holding their seats.
Bkz tmc says they are still in bjp. Manish9893 (talk) 04:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
They have not joined TMC officially
That is the point of TMC it self that mlas are still in bjp.
Read law Manish9893 (talk) 04:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021[edit]
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Rockcodder (talk) 12:00, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Okay...I will keep in mind onwards Manish9893 (talk) 17:40, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Manish9893: Please indent your posts correctly. Rockcodder (talk) 04:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Caste/religion data[edit]
Do not add caste/religion data of candidates unless you have achieved a consensus for it. Such data promotes caste and religion based election propoganda. If you add this again without a consensus, it will amount to Wikipedia:Edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Dhruv edits (talk) 13:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Can You watch Bihar Assembly results 2015 2020
Caste wise MLA details are always used here. You look new to this. Please let it be here bkz it is very important detail often used in all news channels too and Wikipedia too. Manish9893 (talk) 13:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
There is no candidate caste data on that page. Do not use Wikipedia as a caste/ religion propoganda tool. Dhruv edits (talk) 14:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
You have been warned against edit warring by 2 users now. If you revert the edits again without achieving a community consensus, your account will be reported and it could lead to permanent block from editing. Dhruv edits (talk) 14:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Don't violate your topic ban[edit]
(I am not an admin; just a normal editor like you) As you've been notified before, you're under a broad topic ban from India related pages. All your recent edits, to pages like 2022_Uttar_Pradesh_Legislative_Assembly_election and Bharatiya_Janata_Party go, in my opinion, against that ban. I won't report now, but please stop breaking your topic ban. hemantha (brief) 10:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
January 2022[edit]
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."