User talk:Luxord185

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Luxord185, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello From a Fellow Student[edit]

Hi Luxord185, I think interacting via Wikipedia is pretty cool in a way. It's cool to say that we are going to be putting an article on Wikipedia for everyone to see. MatildaStar (talk) 12:35, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 November[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Editing: Overall, you have a really impressive article! There's so much more information on this topic than I thought there would be. The structure of the article kept it organized, making it easier to read. You have a lot of good credible sources to back up all of your information. To improve your article, I would add more links to wiki articles throughout the article. Some parts are very wordy with advanced vocabulary making the audienced more refined to only educated adults, students of archaeology or people with a basic background in arc. Maybe make some parts less complex and more easily understood for students or people with a lower education, or add more explanation. Also, there were some headings which only had one sentence below them. I'm not sure if its necessary to have a heading if the information below is so short, maybe add more information to those areas or find a spot for them in another paragraph. I really enjoyed reading the article, good job!! Theodorerex (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC) I think your article is really well put together and includes a ton of amazing information. I like how you have it organized as well. A few things I found that you could improve on were expanding the metallurgy section. It seems small next to the others and you don't have any examples yet. Another would be to thin out the part at the top of the LSA section about the debate on what that means. I think just providing dates and a general definition would work better. I think that debate belongs more on the LSA article. Lastly I would combine the explanation of the osl dates with the evedence found within those dates. I found it a little hard to keep up with. combine the types of tools with the stages you talk about. Cloebugg (talk) 18:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article feedback[edit]

Excellent work on your additions to the Kalambo Falls article. I wanted to bring up a few minor issues. Only the first letter of each header should be capitalized, except for the case of proper nouns which are always capitalized, such as the names of people or the titles of books. Consider incorporating the websites you added to the article as the sources for inline citations instead of listing them at the end as bare urls. Please let me know if you have any questions. Rob (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:40, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]