User talk:Lucarellie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Lucarellie, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowysusan (talk) 09:59, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! Lucarellie, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 04:13, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Improving your article[edit]

Dear Lucarellie:

It's great that you have decided to improve this article.

Your is most likely about a notable conference, but it's not possible to tell from your references because they are almost all from the conference web site, procedings, etc. A Wikipedia article should not be about what the organization says about itself, but about what others are saying about it. Are there newspaper, outside journal or newsletter articles that you can reference?

Here's a good place to start: at the top of the page you say that certain organizations "support" the conference. These organizations must have publications, so if they support the conference you can find a document from each organization that says so, and specifically in what way.

Also, you absolutely can't use the conferences own publications or web site to say how great it is, that it is "renowned" or "ranks at the top". Just take those references right away and just don't say those things unless you can prove them from outside sources.

The reviewer made a number of suggestions on the top of the page which may help.

There is a lot of duplication on the page. It says at the top of the page what the conference is for, but then you say it again several times further down the page. You say that it will be a gathering of experts, and then you say it again another way later.

The page is full of industry buzz words. It may be perfectly readable in an industry journal, but Wikipedia articles have to be readable by people who aren't in the industry. For example, what is biomass feedstock, or supply chain stakeholders? If it's too difficult to explain, then you've probably put in too much detail that regular readers don't need to know.

In my opinion, as one who knows nothing about biomass but a lot about conferences, here's what your page should say:

1 Lead sentence telling what the conference is and its purpose. You have that now. You can use the conference web site to reference this.

2. Short general description of the conference, (speakers, discussions, meetings, exhibits, award presentations) Outside references needed, especially to support words like "expert", "well-known", etc.

3. History - how did it start, where were the conferences held, maybe about how many attendees, combine your highlights section in here. Outside references needed; were the conferences discussed in the press or in industry newsletters other than the conference publications?

4. Publications - short simple description . Outside references needed for any claim to notability.

5. Affiliated organizations - in what way are they connected to or support the conference? Outside references needed, could be from the other organizations.

Leave out all of the stuff about goals, aims, other motivations; it's what actually happened that should be reported, not what various people had in mind.

Whew! Sorry, hope I haven't depressed you, but you asked for it! —Anne Delong (talk) 13:23, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lucarellie. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "European Biomass Conference and Exhibition".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Biomass Conference and Exhibition}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lucarellie. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "European Biomass Conference and Exhibition".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Biomass Conference and Exhibition}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. C679 08:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lucarellie. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "European Biomass Conference and Exhibition".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:European Biomass Conference and Exhibition}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]