User talk:Loukinho/Archive02
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I have reverted but kept the EL. "The last major painting" is not the same as "the last painting", and a statement as definitive as "this is considered to be the last painting of Picasso's blue period" (or even "the last major painting") should be sourced to an art historian. A Reuters story about an art theft, written on deadline by a non-specialist, is apt to misstate this kind of detail -- the ends of Picasso periods are pretty fluid as a rule. The article as it stands differs very little from what you wrote; it is safe to say that Portrait of Suzanne Bloch is among the last blue period paintings. Ewulp (talk) 06:26, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with your changes and I totally agree with what you said. It looks way better now! Thanks for taking your time to fix it and for helping with the article! Good job! -- Loukinho (talk) 07:26, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Ans: Good Job!
Thanks for the barnstar you awarded me. I appreciate ! Sincerely, Linan (talk) 11:25, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
You still need some sort of reference. Wikipedia is a secondary source only. Primary sources are needed. Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- No need to get snippy. Just an easily located reference is needed. Per Jimbo Wales, everything must be sourced. It's just standard policy; that's all. Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 22:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- That was exactly my point. There's a full list of things yet to be done here. Oh, btw, very sad to use Jimmy Wales as an authority figure or source for wikipedia guidelines. Specially when the article is just about a city and it doesn't make any claims. --Loukinho (talk) 22:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- CobaltBlueTony™ talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Potential superpowers
Olá Loukinho! Há uma discussão ocorrendo em Talk:Potential superpowers#Removal of Brazil e gostaríamos da sua opinião. Obrigado pela atenção! Felipe C.S ( talk ) 23:56, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Recognition
Hi! Thanks so much for the barnstar, Loukinho. I appreciate it! And thanks for starting the Ricardo Teixeira article. Regards, --Carioca (talk) 21:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Pocket Venus (Band)
Hi,
From what I can tell, as I'm new to this either yourself or User: Orange Mike deleted an article on Pocket Venus that I was in the process of writing today. I notice that the reason was something to do with notability, I personally feel the band are notable as being one of the very few unsigned bands to have been played on BBC Radio 1 prime time. Also I was still in the process of writing the article which is why there were very few external links in the entry, could you please undelete the article so I may continue improving the content and thus making it more notable?
Thanks for your time.
Eldeviante —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eldeviante (talk • contribs) 22:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your help with this matter, I now understand why there was concern regarding the article and will update it accordingly.
--Eldeviante (talk) 11:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Why did you tag this as CSD#G7? - Richard Cavell (talk) 03:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MBG Expense Management
I added some references to MBG Expense Management, and I do not think the tone of the article is unduly promotional. You may wish to review Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MBG Expense Management. --Eastmain (talk) 21:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hardwire
Thank you for correcting me I did put Hardwire under armor only because DSM and Honeywell are already there. I am confused why it's okay for them to be there but not us. Could you clarify? I did get an answer from another editor but I would greatly appreciate clarification from you! 75.150.29.70 (sshardwire) 17:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Utah Wikipedia Meetup
| Interested in attending a Utah Wikipedia Meetup? |
|---|
|
If you are interested in a Utah meetup, please visit Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Utah and voice your interest. |
--Admrb♉ltz (talk) 22:20, 15 September 2008 (UTC) via AWB
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Brazil-federacao paulista de futebol.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Brazil-federacao paulista de futebol.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Catas Altas, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Catas Altas da Noruega. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:02, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Mijail Lamas
Please read the references, about his work. Everything is a third party from important mexican cultural institutions. Therefore there is no advertisement. Besides literary grants are quite significant in mexican contemporary literature. Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Icey Eastwood (talk • contribs) 03:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Request board
Regarding your comment here, as the only recent issue with the article appears to be the handful of exchanges between the two of you via edit summaries, an appropriate start would involve opening a conversation at Talk:Ukrainian Brazilian (or User talk:Faustian if he does not comment on the article's talk page). If after some discussion there remains a disagreement between the two of you the next step would be WP:3O, and if there are multiple editors involved in the discussion and still no consensus, then an RfC can be filed to encourage wider participation, but opening a real dialogue beyond edit summaries should be done first. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:44, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- In other words, my request was not read. Sorry. I will just let it be. If somebody else feels like fixing it, do it. I tried already. (if any other user lands in this page and has no clue what is being talked about click here to understand) -- Loukinho (talk) 02:03, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- No, in other words I read your request and I'm the only one who reads and responds to requests there. The board is intended to make it easier for people to file RfCs, but that is not the first step in dispute resolution (as I explained above). I spend most of my time elsewhere so I'm afraid I have little interest in digging into a content dispute and providing a third opinion myself, and so I directed you to the appropriate options at this stage. I'm sorry if you feel slighted, but I'm just trying to tell you how it is. VernoWhitney (talk) 02:52, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
I've reverted your close of this AFD because even with the withdrawal of the nominator, there are still outstanding delete !votes. AFDs can only be closed as "nomination withdrawn" if there are no other "delete" !votes. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
UFC 137
I have been copy pasting what I think is the best version so far to try and keep the vandals at bay. --Adam in MO Talk 03:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)