User talk:Little Jackie

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Little Jackie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Find a Grave. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Auric talk 12:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Embassy Diplomat Screens[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Embassy Diplomat Screens requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.embassycineplex.com/information. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Madonna (entertainer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Dane ^talk 01:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you need help editing? You appear to be making lots of requests for protection on articles via Twinkle when they don't need them? -- Dane ^talk 01:30, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Your abuse of Twinkle must stop if you'd like to continue editing here. -- Dane ^talk 03:29, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your reports to the requests for page protection page[edit]

Little Jackie - I (as well as other administrators) have declined the numerous requests that you've been filing at this noticeboard today. Not only have none of the requests I've reviewed warranted any kind of page protection, most don't fall within the threshold of being debatable as to whether or not protection should be applied. Your requests clearly show that you don't yet understand Wikipedia's protection policy and what edits and situations constitute the need to file a request at RFPP. Your requests are becoming disruptive and to the point that we're starting to simply deny them purely due to the fact that you've filed so many requests and without an understanding of Wikipedia's protection policy. Please do not file any more protection requests until you have reviewed the guideline I've linked you here, and you're certain that you have a proficient understanding of them. Further disruptive page protection requests such as the ones you've been making will lead to action if you continue to do this and without complying with this warning. Please follow my guidance and read the policy page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:02, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 14:45, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See all those warnings up above this section? You are expected to understand them and follow them. Instead, you're just repeating the same mistakes. You're making a lot of work for other people, for no discernible benefit. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:46, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]