User talk:LisztianEndeavors/Archive

Violin Sonata No. 2 in A minor (Schubert) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Violin Sonata No. 2 in A minor (Schubert), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 07:30, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Please explain

Can you please explain what you mean by "stray links"? I didn't get it. I know, however, that I authored some featured articles, and none of them has the external links section before the references, nor the short references before the cited sources. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

It was something that Epicgenius pointed out in Wikipedia:Peer review/Clara Schumann/archive1#Comments from Epicgenius. Look at the old version of the page just after your edit in the history: you'll see the stray link between "Authority control" and "Categories". The templates {{Reflist}} (which is all the "Citations" section contains) and {{Notelist}} (which is all the the "Notes" section contains) have to go AFTER any footnotes on the page (whether they be for sources or general notes), or you get stray footnotes all by themselves near the end of the page that are not in the sections where those templates are. LisztianEndeavors (talk) 20:28, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

OK, found it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of compositions by Franz Liszt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Mayer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

List of compositions by Franz Liszt‎

Hi there, please don't take my recent edit as anything personal. It was a revert per WP:BRD where I considered the edit to be unnecessarily detailed. I think it's great to have these articles where compositions are listed by composer, it's just that the layout of this information is very complicated for the average reader to follow easily. I hope to be able to collaboratively work with anybody who also wants to improve the article. Thanks. Onetwothreeip (talk) 02:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Reply on your own talk page, where the Warning and complaint was placed about you, and not on MY talk page. It is inappropriate to divert a thread about you to someone else's talk page just because that person is the one who posted the warning against you. Posting on someone's talk page IS a "personal" thing, unless it is a Warning of the sort I posted on yours. A warning of that sort is not meant as something personal from me specifically but from the general Wikipedia community at large.

I am refactoring your post here, to your talk page. LisztianEndeavors (talk) 04:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

I wasn't replying to a message you posted on my talk page. This was in regards to an edit summary you made, and a particular article. The message you left on my talk page came after the 02:15 message I've left here. Onetwothreeip (talk) 04:22, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Archive

Hungary article

Could you read over WP:Sandwich as of now text is not legible to the majority of our readers. Pls make the article readable.--Moxy 🍁 04:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Could you be more specific please. What are you referring to? LisztianEndeavors (talk) 04:12, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Nevermind, I figured it out. It was corrected a couple minutes later. Just be patient; I may be too slow for you in my editing. :-) LisztianEndeavors (talk) 07:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Horrible border map we cant edit

pls see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1015#OpenStreetMap advertising?.--Moxy 🍁 07:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

I agree. See my comments on your talk page. I think we just need a static image showing Hungary's borders and its neighbouring countries. LisztianEndeavors (talk) 07:50, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

.....Sure just not in the lead. Pls see The final data of the population census held in 2011 started to be disclosed on 28 March 2013..--Moxy 🍁 08:08, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Disagree (with your lead and census comments). See your talk page for my comments, fixes, etc. This probably should be refactored to the Hungary talk page... LisztianEndeavors (talk) 10:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Don't get blocked just because you don't understand the problem or data.--Moxy 🍁 21:01, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Moxy 🍁 21:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

H

Have locked up the page so you don't get blocked....pls join chat again.--Moxy 🍁 21:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)