User talk:Lil heartthief

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Lil heartthief! Thank you for your contributions. I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

User:Walidou47[edit]

You of course appear to be User:Walidou47 who was just blocked for copyright infringement. Sigh Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know what you are talking about my edits that I just did do not infringe any copyright. I did paraphrasing. I am reverting.Lil heartthief (talk) 09:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You now appear to be socking. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My edits are done in good faith and I am not disrupting: "Anyone who uses multiple accounts in good faith is not violating any policies, shall face no action, and no attempts shall be made to determine if such accounts are linked. But the use of additional accounts for some disruptive or otherwise deceptive purpose is a violation of Wikipedia's sock puppetry policy. "Lil heartthief (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay so you agree you are User:Walidou47 just that your are using multiple accounts in good faith? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and as you can see, all my edits are now okay, we can talk about them if you want.User:Doc James Lil heartthief (talk) 09:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are not to edit Wikipedia going forwards. Simple editing with a new account when your prior account has been blocked is not "good faith" Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why is that ?Lil heartthief (talk) 09:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were given 5 opportunities to stop copy and pasting. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:32, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree but I do not think blocking indefinitly is the appropriate response to that behavior specially that as you can see all my last edits were not copy pasting but actually paraphrasing, so there is nothing wrong with them, so I do not understand why you are reverting good edits that are meant to evolve wikipedia.Lil heartthief (talk) 09:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC) Plus regarding my number number of edits that are about 2000 and this issue of 5 copy paste. I feel that this infinite block is wrong.Lil heartthief (talk) 09:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sock[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lil heartthief (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked in my other account for infringing copyright in doing some copy paste without paraphrasing, now with this account as you can see all my edits I am not doing so, I do not see a reason for block here

Decline reason:

You are not eligible for unblock consideration here. Go back to your original account, address your violations of WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:EVADE, and WP:SOCK. Note that you will almost certainly not be unblocked at this time, given your block evasion. Your best bet is to apply under WP:SO in six months. Yamla (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sure I have requested you a review at WP:AN Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]