User talk:Libernius

November 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Libernius (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the guy who reported me is deleting sources on the wikipedia page left and right, I am reverting the edits to keep the sources from being deleted. I am wrongfully being blocked INDEFINITTELY for reverting edits of page sources. the page up and down is not consistent with the information presented because he deleted the part that mentions chronological development of that empire

the title illustrated the empire after the punic wars and not during the empire's zenith because there is a map below that shows the empire got bigger so the map is not yet the full size as the text USED to show before he deleted it and its sources, so he deleted all of that in the title and also in the history part of the page he removed vassal status of of Bokkar which is mentioned in 3 sources (17,18,19). please check out the edits he made to the page and also read the full article about the subject before blocking

Decline reason:

You created a sock account to evade the block. Your best bet now is to take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time with no more sock accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 21:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Libernius (talk) 17:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note to administrators: The user is now using a sockpuppet account to restore their edits. (Leptis Graecia). Skitash (talk) 18:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Danju87 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Danju87. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 13:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]