User talk:Lelandykes

December 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Robert Weinberg (biologist) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Robert Weinberg (biologist) was changed by Lelandykes (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921318 on 2020-12-10T20:51:23+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:51, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Arifer per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arifer. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cabayi (talk) 13:36, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lelandykes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Help me understand. I am not sure I get this. When someone adds information on Ariel Fernandez in Wikipedia, JoJoAnthrax (or Jydog) accuses the person of being Ariel Fernandez? I read the "charges" but don't see how you reach the conclusion. The logic seems twisted, at least to me. All I can say is that I don't personally know Fernandez and have nothing to do with him, other than having read a couple of his papers on AI. As I was reading him I googled him up and saw the accusations made by Retraction Watch. I took some interest in the case. The accusations were spurious and the logic seemed again contorted. I read a few other Retraction Watch entries and contributed to those as well. I hope this helps clarify the matter. Lelandykes (talk) 20:49, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't have to know Fernandez personally to be a sock or meat puppet. 331dot (talk) 09:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.