User talk:LPFCW

Dear Editors, - I would like to know who and how did merge the name of the Persian leopard page with P.p.tullianapage?

- If you are not a real racist, why didn't you merge the pages under the title of the Persian leopard as it is in scientific papers in high ranking journals?

- Are you aware of the fact that the Persian leopard main population is in Iran and if these kind of issues fires up a political conflict in wildlife conservation, then how the presence of the Persian leopard will be supported by the Iranian transboundary habitats in the neighboring countries under the flag of Iranian wildlife management?

- How many leopards are observed in Turkey during the past decade that you put the name of Turkey everywhere in the text and you keep deleting and blocking editions by others??

- I would really like to know who is Bhagyamani and what is the reason that he is trying to distort the name of the subspecies?

- Dear editors please look at the scientific papers in high ranking journals and change the name of the title of the page to the Persian leopard as it was for so long previously.

I would like to remind you once again: you are affecting the Persian leopard conservation in the entire range by bringing the name of the subspecies into your racism thoughts and manners! This WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED by Iranian experts, NGOs, public and Iranian government! --LPFCW (talk) 00:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)LPFCW

@Donald Albury: thoughts? this guy keeps edit warring over on Panthera pardus tulliana and seems to be really passionate about this lol. He thinks this is politically motivated Ddum5347 (talk) 00:36, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

@Donald Albury: I would really like to know you guys do not have anything else to do rather than keep changing the names in the Middle East area and put the fire in the region?? Is that really funny in your culture if you have any?! Not only me, everyone else now thinks the same! Otherwise why should you guys change the entire page name under the name of a country with (positively) less than 10 records during the past decade?! and not sure if there is any breeding because there is no fact of that!--LPFCW (talk) 00:56, 7 April 2021 (UTC)LPFCW

Warning

Your recent editing history at Panthera pardus tulliana shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

That is fine! Then I will ask other guys from another country keep doing the same! You should learn you do not have the right to change the names!

Procedures

@LPFCW: Proposed changes (such as at Panthera pardus tulliana) must be slowly discussed. It is not reasonable that in less than 24 hours you have gone from a new account to being involved in an edit war with a report at ANI. Please be patient and stop trying to force changes into the article. If that persists you will be indefinitely blocked. Instead, you must engage with the arguments presented by other editors. Do not use terms like "real racist" as that is a complete misunderstanding of the situation and is a failure to participate in the discussion. Johnuniq (talk) 03:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

(User talk:Johnuniq) At first they asked me to bring references to them! I gave them 3 scientific references! Then they gave me a newsletter as a reference to change the name of the page which was there for so long with no edit war! I only want this page to be according to scientific findings and not racisms! That is my right, isn't it?

--LPFCW (talk) 03:52, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

I had to issue the block noted below because that level of edit warring is very unacceptable. No one has a "right" at Wikipedia, other than the right to not use this website. What might be "racisms" to you looks like run-of-the-mill nationalism to others. Wikipedia frequently sees boosterism with drive-by contributors wanting to insert names in a large variety of articles. Wikipedia is a world-wide encyclopedia based on common-usage in the English language. Regardless of that (and I have no opinion regarding the disputed article), disagreements are common and they must be handled as I outlined above. Johnuniq (talk) 03:58, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

You guys wasted much of my time! You are racist and you know you are distorting the reality and the facts and that is unacceptable! Otherwise when I gave you scientific papers you need to stop your warring editions and correct your faults! You even blocked me from editing and even my talk page, how you think you are not racist! By the way I do not care. I will come back to this page and if it was still the same under tulliana name I will do what I said! Bye racists!

For the info of ALL of you : the merging of the former separate pages on Anatolian and Persian leopard was discussed in 2019 and again beween Dec 2020 and March this year, see Talk:Persian_leopard#Merger_proposal_2. It was unanimously decided to merge the 2 pages under the title of the Latin name. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 08:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Johnuniq (talk) 03:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Please give careful consideration to my comments in the previous section because any continuation of problems will result in an indefinite block. Johnuniq (talk) 03:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

That is fine! You guys are not here to discuss! I should talk with you with your own language which I will!

Indeed you need to talk to us with our own language because we are here to discuss. Edit warring isn't discussion. Discussion is visiting the relevant talk page, and explaining why your proposal is supported by our policies and guidelines and seeking WP:consensus which is our language. Accusing anyone who disagrees with you of racism, or demanding we abide by your request or you'll hack us is not our language, and as I already said, edit warring also isn't hence why you're not getting anywhere when you use that "language". If you had calmly and rationally explained why your proposed change was supported by sources, perhaps you'll actually have achieved something. ُNil Einne (talk) 04:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

____________________________________

User:Doug Weller Please see this talk! --LPFCW (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC) User:Johnuniq User:Nil Einne (User talk:Nil Einne) User:BhagyaMani User:Ddum5347It is very funny that you guys are so afraid and BLOCK everyone else rather than me also! and then start to talk to yourselves! You are really racists! and you know why should you be afraid! Because, you are doing wrong here. Particularly, YOU, Johnuniq, go to the first of the page and my previous talk and see I was talking very kindly at first when you guys started to attack me! I know you guys are an international Mafia! Otherwise, why should you BLOCK everyone, and then start to talk with yourselves and let yourselves to edit only?!!!! You should be afraid though and sit on this page 24 hours a day, because I will do what I said and the reason is that you are such antagonistic and racist against other nationalities! --LPFCW (talk) 23:33, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Also if that subspecies is tulliana which is different from what is called saxicolor, and you'd better to know that, then other countries in the range save it by themselves!! Even though they do not have any breeding population or maybe any record!! That is silly! Isn't it??! That is what you are causing in this page with abusing the wikipedia for you own missions!! I suggest you to delete the citations from Iran with the Persian leopard studies on the main and breeding populations also. I do not think any Iranian researcher is willing to be involved in this distorted piece of info --LPFCW (talk) 23:43, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Block evasion

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Panthera pardus saxicolor. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 15:43, 7 April 2021 (UTC)