User talk:KungFuBlackjack

New Democracy and PASOK[edit]

No, what other people may have done or not over the past years is not the current concern. It is you who are creating a massive edit warring issue over these pages by adding unsourced material, and it is your edits which are being contested by multiple editors right now. You are only responding with unfounded accusations and claiming to have a "right to not source" which simply does not exists. WP:V is a CORE policy of Wikipedia, and what you are doing enters into original research territory. Neither original research nor synthesis of sourced material (i.e. making your own interpretation of sources to reach conclusions not explicitly stated in those sources) is not allowed in Wikipedia. You should stop this warring behaviour, because you are about to breach WP:3RR if you haven't already or further, and may prompt administrative action if the conflict persists. Impru20^talk 12:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you just delete my account? But do you think that it is right to allow other people to be edit warring about these pages while there hasn't been a consensus with reliable sources? Some people could say that PASOK shifted from left-wing to centre-right by completely ignoring it's centre-left identity. Others will put New Democracy to the far-right and centre while ignoring that the party's far-right factions are merely substituting the representatives of the Karamanlis faction after the beginning of the financial crisis. And anyway, why are Democrats and Republicans not listed in their political position? I know that there's a big debate about that issue but there's an even greater interest of people to be informed about the truth.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Impru20^talk 13:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on New Democracy (Greece); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Richard BB 15:52, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at New Democracy (Greece)[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:00, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have edited that article previously as Special:Contributions/5.54.142.32. EdJohnston (talk) 16:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KungFuBlackjack, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi KungFuBlackjack! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020, Part II[edit]

This is textbook original research. Please do not re-add it; you should not have done so after the initial reversion, per WP:BRD. If you think something of this nature is merited, propose that on the talkpage, but original research will not be accepted by any user. You should take some time to familiarize yourself with the basic WP policies and guidelines, particularly those around edit warring. Grandpallama (talk) 22:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Libertarianism[edit]

Libertarianism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not only are you edit warring to put in that material, but the material itself violates policies. Stop! North8000 (talk) 04:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KungFuBlackjack, you appear to be actively seeking out an indefinite block. EdJohnston (talk) 04:30, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now you pasted that mega-bundle into Wikipedia talk:No original research with no discussion other than the edit summary. You need to dramatically slow down and learn how Wikipedia works. And also learn how conversation works. Dumping that megabundle everywhere with little or no conversation isn't either. Right now you are just setting yourself on fire. I hope that your probable block isn't indefinite so that you can learn and contribute someday. North8000 (talk) 14:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Any admin may lift this block if they become convinced you will follow Wikipedia policy in the future. It is alarming to see edits like this one where you inject your own personal opinions about the candidates into an infobox summary. You've also been edit warring about the political positions of New Democracy (Greece) and PASOK. The kind of edits you've been making suggest you are not a new user, contrary to the claim you made in an edit summary here. EdJohnston (talk) 16:10, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KungFuBlackjack (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For anyone who wants to know why Trump is left-libertarian, it's his support from Alex Jones, Joe Rogan and Putin, his connection to Bernie Sanders as an enemy of the establishment, the equal popularity of Tulsi Gabbard among his and Bernie's voters, his failure to build a wall that wasn't his own idea but an establishment Republican policy of Bush and Romney, his 2016 primary confrontations with Ted Cruz that reflect Murray Rothbard's opposition to the more right-wing Ayn Rand, the trade wars that were against the free market but weren't combined with a state plan for compensating those who were harmed by it, his admiration for Elon Musk, his hostility towards big media corporations and businessmen like Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Mark Zuckerberg, Michael Bloomberg and George Soros, his deficit spending, his subsidies to farmers, his support for Evangelicals who are less right-wing than Catholics, Muslims or Jews, his refusal to accept Bolton's suggestions about being involved in wars that serve the military-industrial complex and his preference of comparing himself to Reagan, who was a former Democrat that supported Kennedy, rather than Bush, Nixon, the Roosevelts or Lincoln who in my opinion are Romney's role models. And if anyone reads this, know that my comments about Greek politics are using similar examples, even if most people seem to be unaware of the fact that they're just as true as my explanation of Trump's left-libertarianism. ~~~~

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 06:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.