User talk:Kumarnator

Welcome!

Hello, Kumarnator, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Er show us your kUMAR.

Fiji, far out man y'd u pik that, just joking, its all cool. Join me here in the Catholic

Welcome to WikiProject Catholicism![edit]

Hello, Kumarnator, and welcome to Wikiproject Catholicism! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Catholic Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and happy editing!

Flag_of_Fiji.svg

Fiji Tier One nation ?[edit]

Where did you learn that Fiji got the Tier One status ? Stasm 20:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User chess[edit]

Please be careful when editing templates. Your signature appeared on my Userpage as it was connected to a Chess template. I have reverted your previous edit to prevent this from reocurring. If you are unsure that what you are about to do is correct, please discuss this with another editor before making the decision! (aeropagitica) 08:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warned[edit]

Regarding this and this edit, please refrain from making such uncivil and profane comments. Any further comments like this will result in blocking of your editing privileges. Thank you. --Ragib 05:32, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

blocked for 24 hours[edit]

You have been blocked for your comments, which amounts to personal attack, and to some extent, a physical threat. Please refrain from attacking other editors. Comment on content, rather than on other users. I hope once your block expires, you'll be back and edit in a constructive manner. Thank you. --Ragib 09:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks[edit]

Regarding this edit, Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Also, please do not use all capital letters in talk page messages. Such messages are considered to be yelling. Thank you.

--Ragib 01:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reading your comments[edit]

Kumarnator,I was unaware of the comments you posted on my page.I only learned of them when Ragib provided me with the link.

I would first like to adress your accusation of me being "prejudiced" against Ragib of reffering to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Pakistani_Wikipedians which is infact a page limited to Pakistanis only.You may check the whole page if you disbelive me. If you still disbeleive me,ask Ragib,or any user or any wikipedia administrator,biased or not.But that's not at all the reason why he blocked me.

Ragib and I have had quarrals in the past as well.But you will be surprised to know how well we actually get along,so please dont let some regular quaralls between (a common thing between users and administrators) give you the idea that I regard Ragib as "biased".I do have problems with his Indian pal user:Fowler&Fowler,but it does not extend to him.He had attempted to block me because I cut and paste content from another site which violates wikipedia copyright rules and was right to do so. Even though Ragib and I have no problems,I still have complained to him about double game by administrators,and have strongly advised him to keep a close eye on user:~~Fowler&Fowler~~

In addition,your hateful messages mean nothing to me,so dont bother with them.Ragib did give you a 24-hour block and also gave me a link on my user page to all the funny things youve been saying.

Last of all,if you post comments,or articles without using your user name,I can easily delete them,and yes it's not vandalism.See wikipedia:vandalism.And I do believe the only "scared" person is the person who posts such hateful things without providing a user name or not even signing his/her name.ThankyouNadirali 03:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali[reply]

For the record, fowler&fowler is not Indian, and there are many Indian users here that dont engage in harassment like certain users. If you have problems go to WP:INB (the talk page).Baka man 04:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from Nadirali[edit]

First of,sign your name before leaving a comment on a talk page.

Second regarding me "polishing my english" or my "spelling mistakes",I would like to point out that you spelled recieve as "reciee" and deleting as "delting".

Last of all,you seem awfully interested in debates regarding the indus and Pakistan.If you are so,I suggest you to talk with User:Szhaider on SA issues.He is very proud of being Pakistani(like me) and is currently working with wikipedia to remove the refference of the indus civilization from the History of Indiapage and moving it either to the History of Pakistan or history of south Asia page.

I hope you will find conversing with Szhaider interesting.And yes I do consider Szhaider as MY PAL of all Pakistani users on wikipedia.

"I dont think that you had any business whatsoever interfering in our talk".I find it strkingly curious why a Fijianis suddenly posting on SA talk page.

I have no idea what "JAI HIND" means.Nadirali 05:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali[reply]

Reply[edit]

Number one dont parade being anti-Muslim or anti-Arab. There are 1.2-1.5 billion Muslims and a large number of nice ones (Ashfaqulla Khan, Abdul Kalam, Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi, Dave Chappelle, etc.). Saying you hate arabs makes you seem racist, which is not a good image to portray. I myself like and dislike many Muslim and Arab people, but you cant generalize. I noticed that you are Christian also, there are a large number of Christian Arabs and Jewish Arabs, so you are attacking your Chaldean & Maronite brethren. About Pakistani propaganda, there are smarter ways of saying what you mean than outright "I'm here to combat Pakistani propaganda". Saying things like that makes your bias obvious, and makes you no better than Szhaider and Nadirali with their "were here to right the wrongs of Pakistan" and "India is the scourge to world peace" nonsense.Baka man 18:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)\[reply]

Hey hey hey!!!!! I never said that I hated Arabs or Muslims!! What I did say, was that I am trying to dimnish Arab propaganda from Wikipedia. What I meant by this was that I was working to monitor the comments from users such as Nadirali! I am not racist, and if you see my user page, you will read that my parents are of different nationalities!!(Then maybe you should learn something from them) I personally knew good muslims( but we drifted apart after primary school).Regarding the propaganda, Nadirali, for example in the past has attacked many indians personally, and as you being hindu I think you will agree that peaceful protest is the best option.

indus[edit]

http://www.heritage.gov.pk/html_Pages/indus.html

Read the article on the link provided above.The people of Syria are a mix of Arab and Assyrian descent just as the people of Pakistan are descendants of the indus.

Pakistan is indeed home to the indus just as Egypt is home to the Egypt civilization(today known as Missr to it's native people,but people of primarily of the ancient Egyption descent).Only an exteremly tiny part of indian territory coincided with the indus,which was colonized by the ancestors of today's Pakistanis.The main difference between the ancestors of today's Pakistanis and the Pakistanis today is that the people of the Indus were Buddhist(not Hindu which is also another reason behind those Bhuddist statues in Afghanistan.)wheras the people of Pakistan today are mostly Muslim.

For your information if you want to fight "Arab propaganda" on wikipedia,then youre fighting the wrong guys.Pakistanis are not Arabs in case you didnt know.I really dont care about what you edit on Arab articles and couldn't care any less.I also couldn't care any less about what you think of the indus being Pakistani or not.

So long

Nadirali 03:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali[reply]

First of all, all your reverations regarding "syria" are false.I mentioned Assyria to not be arab,not syria, and for the record, I recgonise, as well as many syrians themselves to be arab. The ancestors of todays pakistani's were really indians that migrated north into their land, which explains their Bhuddist faith ( if you did any research you would recognise that Bhudda himself was an Indian prince, and many Bhuddists remain in India today).You mention "indian" territory- buddy, before 1947, it was all INDIAN territory!!!!

Secondly, it is very pathetic of you to leave your arguments half ended- really dont care about what you edit on Arab articles and couldn't care any less.I also couldn't care any less about what you think of the indus being Pakistani or not." If you really believed what you were saying, you would fight it to the death (as is the Muslim way, stand up and fight, be a man) Not true.Just as I wouldn't need to convince you that 2+7=9 when I really believe it is and couldn't care any less if you believed it to be something else.

Lastly, I believe that Pakistanis are arabs, because you're language is merely Hindi mixed with Arabic and such- hence your stlye of writing.Pakistanis look arab and many call them selves arab ( especially in europe), so Im now not sure who to believe.No wonder you sound so confused.

P.S- Incase you didn't know, its Egyptian, not"Egyption"

Good day to you sir.

Re:i dont understand[edit]

Reading without critical thinking is dangerous to one's intellect. ‎Szhaider 12:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your hilarious[edit]

Secondally, you have mentioned that I used the word "pussy", to atleast 3 users. As usual, this was a Dr spin from you to try and make me look like some evil, stupid maniac!!! Though the people can see through you!!! Wow I didn't know "the people" have X-ray vision like Superman!!!-LOL Kumarnator,I didnt know you could be this much fun to pull the strings on-LOL.You see I almost never read what you say,but when I stumbled across "The people can see through you",I burst into uncontrolable laughter.As I said,I didnt know you could be so much fun to pull the strings on.(Just like a puppet which ends up dancing to how the controller pulls it's strings.-LOL)(Chuckle)

Nadirali 06:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali[reply]

For your information regarding me deleting that pargraph from your page,I decided to post it on Szhaider's page instead(where you can read them if you're so desperate to find out what they said),where he can see it instead of bothering to come here and read your meaningless comments.

Honestly Kumarnator,your going to kill me with laughter if you keep going on.-LOLNadirali 07:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali[reply]

Well Nadirali, as usual, you have contradicted yourself once again. And About my "meanaingless" comments, you stupid arab, your comments are the menaningless ones.. Who is going to beleieve some stupid aganostic- no faith. no brains.no power.no sense of humour. hahahahah.Your the one Im laughing at.You see, since that beginning, I have posted comments to make you angry, make you reply, and make you waste your time on the lies of the world. Ever since the beginning, I have ventured to see how far your lack of intelligence and second class citizenship would take you.And now I know.

P.S Do you have a beard??? Most arabs do you see...However, I must admit, some good arabs have them too..Pity for them to have people like you dragging them lower..and lower...and lower.....

48 hour block for personal attacks[edit]

Regarding this edit,

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism, including page blanking or addition of random text, spam, or deliberate misinformation; privacy violations; personal attacks; and repeated and blatant violations of WP:NPOV will not be tolerated..

Please don't make comments regarding one's ethnicity or national origin. See WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA for guidelines. If someone or something bothers you, the best way is to ignore them, rather than replying to them through ad hominem attacks. Thank you. --Ragib

Apparantly he thought he was somehow hurting my feelings by bashing the Arabs.Nadirali 23:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Nadirali 08:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my reply on your talk page....

Kumarnator 08:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advice[edit]

Ignore Nadirali and start working on other articles. As you've probably heard, there's been a coup in Fiji, and a page like that demands your attention. Work on articles like those for a little while and keep away from the annoyances.Baka man 02:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are completly right Bakaman.These people are here to annoy me, with their false claims to get me distracted from what really matters to me-( the fijiam coup for example, not arguing with some pointless fool about his attcks.)

Anyway, thanks for the advice.

I'd second Bakasupraman's suggestion (the same thing I advised Nadirali). Discussion, counter-comments like the dialog between you and Nadirali was leading to nowhere, so it is better to ignore each other for the time being, and get back to writing an encyclopedia. I hope you will have constructive edits when you return from the block. Thanks. --Ragib 08:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

\

Diocesan Infobox[edit]

To the Members of the WikiProject Catholicism

I have proposed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism an infobox for Catholic Dioceses. I have not gotten any feedback on this proposal, so I’m culling feedback, advice, corrections, etc. for this. If you have the time, would you check out User:SkierRMH/Diocese_Infobox and give me some feedback! Thanks much!!

User pages[edit]

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent. It may be seen as vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please visit the sandbox. feydey 07:59, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chaldean[edit]

Hi, well techniquelly Chaldean is a religion sect, just like how a Shia muslim is a religion sect. In the Middle East, the vast majority of Chaldeans consider themselves to be ethnically Assyrian. But its different in the diaspora, like places in the U.S. or Australia, where the Chaldeans their strongly oppose being Assyrian and claim to be a different ethnicity. One this for sure is that we both speak the same language, share common culture, live in the same villages, etc. Chaldean 05:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So then, technically, all Chaldeans are actually Assyrian? I have a friend who had claimed for all his life that he was Assyrian, but then met my other good friend who convinced him that he was actually Assyrian.... That is why i am so confused..

Please critically note that the above comment alluding to Hermiz was at a time of Kumars anger.The bear has never had, nor ver will have failing in his agenda- that;s more in ur league....

p.s- Fiji was the best time of my life, and Frank Bainimarama is Prime Minister- HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

I'm On Wikibreak!!!!!![edit]

Hi, Guys, im on wikibreak

Stop personal attacks or you will be blocked again[edit]

User:Kumarnator, you have already been blocked once for violating the NPA policy. As seen in this recent post of yours [1], you are still using attack language which is not allowed here. While User:Williamdevino was obviously trolling in an attempt to cause trouble, that is not excuse to stoop to his level. If this continues you will be blocked.--Alabamaboy 21:19, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prod[edit]

Vunikavikaloa[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vunikavikaloa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Vunikavikaloa. Alan.ca (talk) 21:40, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012[edit]

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Fair Use in Australia discussion[edit]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery