User talk:Kiwiinjapan1984

I have to disagree with your characterization of Punning's edits to Kurashiki, Okayama as vandalism. Those edits removed what appear to be fairly blatant violations of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Remember that Wikipedia is not a soapbox. No matter how "accurate" you consider the removed statements, if they are not neutral and not sourced, they must be (and correctly were) removed. Dethme0w (talk) 05:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Kurashiki NET Program (Native English Teacher Program)

You're going to have to explain your continual injection of non-neutral point of view in this article before you continue, or you could be accused of POV-pushing and possibly edit-warring. Dethme0w (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kurashiki, Okayama, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dethme0w (talk) 05:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Kurashiki, Okayama

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Kurashiki, Okayama, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dethme0w (talk) 05:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Re your message: You have not provided any verifiable and reliable sources for your claims. You, as the editor, of the content must provide sources for your claims, especially those of potential contentious material. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Kurashiki, Okayama, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dethme0w (talk) 05:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Account blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kiwiinjapan1984 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Dethme0w (talk) 15:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)