User talk:Kill me when i die

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Meat mum?[edit]

What do that has to do with Autism? 83.248.67.253 (talk) 17:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Username[edit]

Do you really think that it's appropriate? Sounds pretty vile and negative.  – Tommy [message] 00:42, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

okay. thanks for the reply  – Tommy [message] 11:39, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

US Invasion of the Conch Republic[edit]

I am being serious, which is more than I can say for yourself. Off we go to AfD. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 23:33, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're being serious about what Associated Press calls the "mock" Conch Republic, well, more's the pity. State your case in the AfD discussion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 23:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recruiting for your "cause"[edit]

You know, you're getting off to a pretty bad start at Wikipedia. And recruiting others in your "cause" to do whatever you think you can do to me is not only futile, but seen as a form of stalking. Because of your poor behavior, administrators are watching every post you make on Wikipedia. I can tell you now that they do not look favorably upon a newcomer who is attempting to campaign against an experienced editor. My advice: Either take some time to learn how Wikipedia operates and what its rules are, or go elsewhere. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May I remind you that it was you who went to other users, trying to see what you could "do about" me? I think you're the one who needs to watch your behavior. You're still on the watch list of several admins now for your actions; what they do is their business. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 23:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"They" being admins, such as the one who wrote the message below (at least I think he or she is an admin). Yes, I can be abrasive at times, especially when I think someone is trying to pull a fast one. I'm a reporter by profession, so it goes with the territory. My apologies if I came across too harsh. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:01, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Curious[edit]

I'm curious what you meant by this edit. What exactly are you wanting to "do" with this editor? Jmlk17 07:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

World War II template[edit]

Hi, please don't add the World War II template to articles on individual battles of the war - as you can see from the template's topics, it's only really relevant to high-level articles such as those on major campaigns. Nick-D (talk) 00:02, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Nick-D (talk) 00:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely for sock puppetry. (blocked by –MuZemike 15:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kill me when i die (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry, but you have no evidence that i'm a sockpuppet

Decline reason:

Checkuser uses documented evidence revolving around your IP address to confirm whether you have operated more than one account from the same address. It is combined with behavioural evidence to prove beyond reasonable (or in some cases, total) doubt that you are socking. S.G.(GH) ping! 21:11, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CheckUser evidence confirms that Kill me when i die is So doggamn. –MuZemike 20:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's a gap in my knowledge here, what is 'CheckUser' and how does it compare me to "So doggamn"... whoever that is? Kill me when i die (talk) 20:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
...and Bully25 and I'll dog your gam. –MuZemike 21:11, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kill me when i die (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, Bully25 is my old account, i'm not denying that, but what evidence do you have that i'm So Doggamn. Furthermore, you can check my edit history, i've made 'non notable' articles a few times, but i'm not a vandal

Decline reason:

A checkuser block is not going to be overturned by any non-checkuser admin. Your only option is to e-mail the blocking admin.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:55, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kill_me_when_i_die&oldid=1141500784"