User talk:Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah

{{Admin help}} admin can see my socks edits to give me se ond chance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah (talk • contribs) 03:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have an open unblock request, I have disabled the admin help template as it serves no purpose. Please be patient, an administrator will be around to assist you shortly. 78.28.44.111 (talk) 08:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Your recent edits to User talk:Kautilya3 could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. regentspark (comment) 14:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If they want not to be charged by legal action .He should not blame the supreme authority of India prime minister Narendra Modi Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah (talk) 18:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. regentspark (comment) 18:47, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=I haven't said to take legal action , I only ask kautilya to not blame the prime minister of India Narendra Modi Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah (talk) 18:50, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't said to take legal action against him.I only ask kautilya to not blame the prime minister of India Narendra Modi for any politicsKhadim ahlesunnah waljamaah (talk) 18:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"It is unlawful to blame the supreme authority of India prime minister Narendra Modi", "If they want not to be charged by legal action .He should not blame the supreme authority of India prime minister Narendra Modi" This is honestly kind of offensive, and a clear legal threat. And very many other instances where you are breathtakingly rude ("So please take a necessary action", "Please reply as soon as possible", "Reply fast", "Reply fast", "Reply fast", "Reply fast", "Reply fast", "I won't wait i have other task to do". Yamla (talk) 20:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

With reference to unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for making legal threats I hereby Solemnly affirms that I am not taking any legal action against Wikipedia or any other editor related to Wikipedia also will try to maintain the norms of Wikipedia in near future without doing any edit warring and other misbehave and will definitely work for the development of the wikipedia constructively in near future so please consider my request Thanks have a great time Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah (talk) 01:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Withdrawing the legal threat resolves that matter, but that is far from the only issue here. Your use of multiple accounts has caused you to be formally banned from editing Wikipedia- which the block is enforcing. To remove the ban, there must be a community discussion and consensus to remove the ban. Please follow the instructions at WP:UNBAN, under the heading "Editors who cannot edit any page except their talk page" for instructions on how to proceed. 331dot (talk) 01:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help me requests are unnecessary, as you have an open unblock request. Stand by. 331dot (talk) 01:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for making legal threats I hereby Solemnly affirms that I am not taking any legal action against Wikipedia or any other editor related to Wikipedia also will try to maintain the norms of Wikipedia in near future without doing any edit warring and other misbehave and will definitely work for the development of the wikipedia constructively in near future so please consider my request Thanks have a great time

Decline reason:

You are currently checkuser blocked for socking. Not for threats of legal action. regentspark (comment) 02:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for making legal threat and sockpuppetry O hereby Solemnly affirms that I am not taking any legal action against Wikipedia or any other related to Wikipedia also will not use the sock account in near future please unblock me thanks have a great time Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah (talk) 03:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The standard offer is your best bet to being unblocked. If you can go six months without sock puppetry, we'll reconsider your block. I don't think any CheckUser is going to unblock you before then. I don't know anything about cross-wiki disruption, but you need to show admins on English Wikipedia proof that you're capable of following our policies. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please don't remove declined unblock requests while you're still blocked. I have restored them for you. —Wasell^(T) 07:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am leaving this note for reviewing admin. This user through his suck account Maizbhandariya has vandalized Wikipedia, personally abused and attacked me for guiding him to Wikipedia policies. He mostly shared a sectarian type bias on our platform, and it isn't meant for that. He resorted to Urdu Wikipedia to complaint against that I was propagating Deobandi Wahhabi ideology on the Wikipedia. His First message, Second message and third message to a Urdu Wikipedia admin are crystal clear that he is using Wikipedia only for vandalism. He also resorted to Meta to disrupt Wikipedia. See for example this m:Special:MobileDiff/20048039 and there is much more he has done through IP address and through User name Maizbhandariya on meta. I would like to review the user's presence on all wiki's. Best - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 23:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarika-e-Maizbhandari‎ while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account continuing to be blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. This edit at 04:09, 12 May 2020 (UTC) by 106.193.105.71 was by you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 05:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be editing as Special:Contributions/106.193.105.95-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:03, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be editing as Special:Contributions/106.193.105.66-- Toddy1 (talk) 05:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And as Special:Contributions/106.78.194.193-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:50, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And as Special:Contributions/106.193.104.101-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:54, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And as Special:Contributions/106.193.105.10-- Toddy1 (talk) 02:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And as Special:Contributions/106.193.104.79-- Toddy1 (talk) 03:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And as Special:Contributions/106.193.105.91-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And as Special:Contributions/2409:4042:E9F:14B0:0:0:6D08:E613{{31}}{{25A (talk)}} 18:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Unbroken Chain (talk) 13:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gaurav Tathe Patil (sonuspeaks09)[edit]

Hello, Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gaurav Tathe Patil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:44, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ahlesunnat wal Jamaat[edit]

Hello, Khadim ahlesunnah waljamaah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahlesunnat wal Jamaat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]