User talk:Katie.anderson.5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Katie.anderson.5, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 02:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Group Talk[edit]

Hey Guys, here is our page to be able to talk to each other! What do you think we should do for our project? Katie.anderson.5 (talk) 17:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I like the idea of working on the Reproducibility Project as our topic. Katie you had another good idea in class about a topic but I do not remember what it was. Both choices need to be worked on so they sound like interesting topics to me. Justin.a.arp (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah Justin, I agree. I like that too, especially since it's such a hot topic in psych right now! The other idea I had was shock therapy, but there is already a good article about Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT), which I'm pretty sure shock therapy was the beginning of. So should we do the Reproducibility Project? I'm good with that? Tom? Katie.anderson.5 (talk) 16:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That works for me. Reproducibility Project as our number one choice should we put the Shock Therapy as our second choice? Justin.a.arp (talk) 17:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AGREED J. ARP. Katie.anderson.5 (talk) 17:09, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yea I like that idea of Reproducibility. I don't know about shock therapy though because I feel I've had to study it at least twice every semester since freshman year. But I'm good with the first choice absolutely. Thomas.barneson31 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


→So wouldn't you know more about it, Tom? Katie.anderson.5 (talk) 22:10, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your topic: Reproducibility project[edit]

Hello Group 4: I think the Reproducibility project is a great topic. It has been receiving a lot of attention lately, so there will be lots of information. They also have a website, which will give you a great deal of material. Even though this is a new development, I think it has great historical signficance. J.R. Council (talk) 03:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]